Crush...Yiff...Destroy!

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

.... furries come up with something new.

http://vcl.ctrl-c.liu.se/vcl/Artists/David-Sjostrom/Adult/AdultDeleena005_exp.jpg

Someone get the Bactine... I sense some nasty cuts on the way.

Paul · Coadjutor Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 138

:shock: OUCH!

Kadius · Coadjutor Joined: 10 Feb 2004 Posts: 147

Owie. But man, is that teh hott sex. 'i stabb u in teh cunt'

Excuse me while I clean my monitor.

...

...

What the hell man? Is this some sort of wave of new sadistic gorey spooge art?

Also, I'd hope any woman that saw that suddenly had the urge to beat the person who drew that senseless.

mouse · Coadjutor Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 662

Owie. But man, is that teh hott sex. 'i stabb u in teh cunt'
Is this some sort of wave of new sadistic gorey spooge art?

The sort of thing you hear in death metal lyrics..why it shows up in furry art?

just sick fucks (most likely) who get off on sexualized violence, they happen to be furries as well

Im more just kind of curious, what it is about morphs that attracts this sort of thing in the first place? Is it just the nature of the metaphorical character, you can attach anything to it ? its a very pliable style/genre/meta-genre (whatever)? I might not be looking at a big enough part of the picture here though...

(any of those psych researchers that were supposedly looking into furry fandom SHOULD be asking question more like this - IMO, the true answers to these questions would more closely reflect the reality of why furry fandom has become so very very fucked)

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

Im more just kind of curious, what it is about morphs that attracts this sort of thing in the first place? Is it just the nature of the metaphorical character, you can attach anything to it ? its a very pliable style/genre/meta-genre (whatever)? I might not be looking at a big enough part of the picture here though...

That may very well be. I dunno if there's really any kind of correlation, but keep in mind that a lot of serial killers and such started off by killing/mutiliating animals. I can only assume that perhaps this gave them their "fix" while seeming not as bad as assaulting a human being. Perhaps to some of these artists, furries are perceived as "less than human" and are therefore better able to have their more twisted fantasies be forced upon the characters. They can do whatever to them, and perhaps feel like it's not as bad as if they were drawing something actually being done to a human. After all, it's not all that uncommon to see furry characters that have been described as "bred as sex slaves" or something in their descriptions.

Perhaps even when a human is drawn, it seems more real than when a furry character is drawn. After all, any person drawn, even if imaginary, stands a chance of resembling someone that actually exists. Whereas a furry is "safer" because it clearly doesn't exist. Perhaps that's justification to them.

That's one reason I've always had concern for these furries that are into pedophilia, but insist it's only in VR or in drawings. I just don't buy the idea that you can be into something VR, and not have an interest in it RL. If you are roleplaying a pedophilia scene, then, to me, that suggests that some part of you is interested in that sort of thing. Hopefully, the person in question will never act on those thoughts. But, for those that do, there's usually a progression from fantasizing to actually doing... progressing step-by-step as one form of sating the urge eventually fails to satisfy it. I always had concerns about that, because if you're willing to play a pedophilia scene VR, that suggests to me that there are things in motion there that could set the stage for RL activities someday. Hopefully not, though.

(any of those psych researchers that were supposedly looking into furry fandom SHOULD be asking question more like this - IMO, the true answers to these questions would more closely reflect the reality of why furry fandom has become so very very fucked)

I think you're dead-on with the idea that furry doesn't create these screwed-up individuals. They were warped to begin with. Furry just somehow attracted them. The fact that many furries will pat you on the head and tell you any twisted fetish is perfectly normal, and that to suggest otherwise is "intolerant" I'm sure has something to do with it. These nutjobs find in furries a group that will accept them and not tell them that wanting to stuff a sword up a woman's crotch is messed-up..... and so they make themselves at home.

DA · Coadjutor Joined: 06 Jun 2003 Posts: 320

Ow...*crosses her legs* That just makes me want to wince in sympathy, how the hell can anyone find that a turn on?

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

I'm still not sure what to make of the scenario... obviously, it's a sword, but, is it like super-dull or something? Or is it just a shiny dildo with a sword hilt? Thankfully, there's no blood or cutting in the picture.... but that also further adds to the WTF factor.... so, he's cramming a sword in her, but yet she's magically free from harm? Is it a play sword? Or.. and this is my vote... is the artist just completely mindless of the kinds of things that are gonna happen when you cram a cutting instrument into a body cavity?