Crush...Yiff...Destroy!

Paul · Coadjutor Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 138

... no, they're not a law firm. Anyways, knowing Jay Naylor's holier-than-thou, right-wing-christian attitude as it comes through in his writings and in his Better Days comic, I was a wee bit surprised to come across this little piece of porn he's done. Maybe I'm just prejudiced when I think his own comic and this sketchy thingie are incompatible; maybe he'll draw anything for money; maybe... I dunno. Whatever, for your viewing displeasure, here's Naylor's furry alter ego Fisk being buttfucked by a six-breasted dragon hermaphrodite. Make of it what you will, I'm mostly disoriented.

Page one, page two, page three, page four, page five, page six, page seven (with free bonus herm!), page eight.

Gene Ternruh · Recusant Joined: 10 Mar 2004 Posts: 18

GOD BLESS AMERICA

TAKE THAT FUCKING HAT OFF AND SALUTE THE GODDAMN FLAG YOU LITTLE FUCKING COMMUNIST

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

You kidding? Naylor and porn go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Rankin · Coadjutor Joined: 03 Jan 2004 Posts: 488

I'm just waiting for "Fisk" and "Flounce" to have some type of 'around the world'. Wait, aren't they supposed to be similar aspects of the same? Oh, hell, I'm confused. I give up. I'll go back to reading Ghastly - at least he knows he's fucked in the head - and he's funny, sometimes. ;)

Shit. I hate Firebird sometimes. I guess I somehow lost my paragraph before this little bit of drivel above. I believe the general concensus was, at least according to the holder of these pictures, that Jay was enamored by their character, and drew these pictures while in some 'puppy-dog lust' phase.

thegunman · Qualificator Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 37

it must suck to be that retarded and fucked up.

and whats with the lizard with tits and hair screwing a mouse looking thing i guess he will draw anything. :roll:

would speak more but it's late and i'm tired, my 2pennies

Paul · Coadjutor Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 138

GOD BLESS AMERICA

TAKE THAT FUCKING HAT OFF AND SALUTE THE GODDAMN FLAG YOU LITTLE FUCKING COMMUNIST

I now see the error of my ways, I acknowledge the all-American patriotism inherent in being bumfucked by a multi-titted dragon herm, I hereby salute the stars and stripes and promise to send all my money to Jay Naylor.

The_Censorship_Nazi · Rasophore Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 59

I hereby dub everyone on Earth to be totally insane, thus rendering the idea of sanity a hollow mockery of itself.

*shrug* I dunno. I did have something poignant to say, but I decided to say "the hell with it" and kill the topic by making it silly beyond all recognition. To that end, we are replacing the American flag with a Swastika. That is all.

thegunman · Qualificator Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 37

just found this guys "offical site" :roll:

According to him his a consevitive patriot......yeah whatever.

seems someone needs to inform him that conservatives are against porn and sexual deviance, but i guess he's special.

about the only thing i agree with him on is his support for the 2nd Amendment and i'm not to sure of his credibility on that issue ethier (seems like he's never even fired a daisy bb gun let alone real guns).

he just needs to flush out his headgear and clean up his act along with his artwork.

The New Meat · Coadjutor Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 327

Ever notice how very few people like both the first and second ammendments? Just sayin'.

thegunman · Qualificator Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 37

Ever notice how very few people like both the first and second ammendments? Just sayin'.

hey i see where this is going. i like the 1st just as much as the 2nd. but the 1st amendment wasn't meant to protect divient and kiddy porn which the "artist " in question has put forth. just like the 2nd wasn't put into place to allow guns to be use for crimilal use.

you can own a gun to protect yourself, but you can't use it to hold-up a gas station. just like you can't draw Socially unexceptable pictures (such as little mousey kid looking thing being screwed by big hairy six tited lizard thing) and not expect to catch heat from other people.

that just one mans opinon i guess.

mouse · Coadjutor Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 662

(such as little mousey kid looking thing being screwed by big hairy six tited lizard thing)

Actually, I am pretty sure that is a cat. That's Fisk, his personal cat character.

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

hey i see where this is going. i like the 1st just as much as the 2nd. but the 1st amendment wasn't meant to protect divient and kiddy porn which the "artist " in question has put forth. just like the 2nd wasn't put into place to allow guns to be use for crimilal use.

you can own a gun to protect yourself, but you can't use it to hold-up a gas station. just like you can't draw Socially unexceptable pictures (such as little mousey kid looking thing being screwed by big hairy six tited lizard thing) and not expect to catch heat from other people.

that just one mans opinon i guess.

In other words, furries, smut peddlers, and gun maniacs fail to realize that with the amazing luxury of our freedoms comes the awesome responsibility to exercise them with discretion.

mouse · Coadjutor Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 662

I dont like Naylor's blatantly pornographic work , but personally I think his pin-up stuff is really good. His politics I dont like, and the fact that it seems his views and what he draws would contradict each other is funny. I've never read his comics, I just kind of like his character style.

I only have problem with extremely fucked up artwork...

amazing luxury of our freedoms comes the awesome responsibility to exercise them with discretion.

this sort of language is kind of extreme for what we are talking about here. Furries often don't use discretion, but let's be realistic here, often other people go out actively looking for stuff, find it, then come back talking about people not using discretion. He isnt plastering this stuff in bus terminals.

also: here is a pic of his very gay mouse character, Flounce (not that there is anything wrong with that..)

And here is Fisk, looking all badass, as opposed to the pics in this thread where he is fucking a hermaphrodite dragon with a beak in a bathtub

Wayd Wolf · Coadjutor Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 456

And here is Fisk, looking all badass, as opposed to the pics in this thread where he is fucking a hermaphrodite dragon with a beak in a bathtub

Badass? That?

Does ANYONE REALLY think that's badass?

I mean, would ANYONE be scared with some military suited guy with a rifle drawing down on them? Come on.

I mean, if you are, then you're not grasping the penultimate point that whatever is going to happen will happen and you're a bit too late to do anything about it. So either you're going to die or you won't. Why worry?

Badass is the little girl with the bloody steak knife who is still at bay and you've got nothing better than a popsicle stick to work with. Do you let her cross that ten feet and jam the popsickle stick in her ear? Do you let her waste you so you don't die with her death on your conscience? Do you run like a wussy-boy and hope the cops come and dope her ass on Thorazine? Now that's badass.

What?

Why are you all staring at me like that?

Anyhow man, Naylor's views are totally irrellevant compared to his artwork and his artwork seems like BOC-lite to me. So even if it is freaking weird, it's not really of any consequence. Now if Jim Hardiman started drawing tentacle rape pics instead of halfway sexy skunk girls(who I forget are skunks to begin with as they resemble some girls I knew growing up), then I'd get a little aroused to write something.

Wayd Wolf · Coadjutor Joined: 06 Oct 2003 Posts: 456

Ever notice how very few people like both the first and second ammendments? Just sayin'.

The unarmed man can be silenced with ease.

The armed man can be silenced only with great effort.

The unarmed man has to rant like a dork before he gets shot.

The armed man can be laid back and speak at leisure.

I prefer the armed man thing. Just me.

And yeah, I'll take fire for David's right to be a silly socialist twit at times. Voltaire and all that.

Natenate · Recusant Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 19

Ever notice how very few people like both the first and second ammendments? Just sayin'.

The unarmed man can be silenced with ease.

The armed man can be silenced only with great effort.

The unarmed man has to rant like a dork before he gets shot.

The armed man can be laid back and speak at leisure.

I prefer the armed man thing. Just me.

And yeah, I'll take fire for David's right to be a silly socialist twit at times. Voltaire and all that.

So, maybe John McCain should have gunned down the the GOP after Karl Rove accused him of being a dopped-up, miscegenating, VeitCong Stoolie.

...

...

...

Overdeveloped Machismo: While there is no cure, there is hope.

mouse · Coadjutor Joined: 13 Jul 2003 Posts: 662

Badass? That?

Does ANYONE REALLY think that's badass?

uhm, probably Naylor? That is why I said it after all.
What else could you have in mind drawing your character like that?

I mean, if you are, then you're not grasping the penultimate point that whatever is going to happen will happen and you're a bit too late to do anything about it. So either you're going to die or you won't. Why worry?

who's worried?
We are talking about a cartoon character here

Now if Jim Hardiman started drawing tentacle rape pics instead of halfway sexy skunk girls(who I forget are skunks to begin with as they resemble some girls I knew growing up), then I'd get a little aroused to write something.

You might want to rephrase this ..

Rankin · Coadjutor Joined: 03 Jan 2004 Posts: 488

Now if Jim Hardiman started drawing tentacle rape pics instead of halfway sexy skunk girls(who I forget are skunks to begin with as they resemble some girls I knew growing up), then I'd get a little aroused to write something.

You might want to rephrase this ..

I think we both know what he meant. :shock:

The New Meat · Coadjutor Joined: 03 Jun 2003 Posts: 327

Ever notice how very few people like both the first and second ammendments? Just sayin'.

The unarmed man can be silenced with ease.

The armed man can be silenced only with great effort.

The unarmed man has to rant like a dork before he gets shot.

The armed man can be laid back and speak at leisure.

I prefer the armed man thing. Just me.

Yeah, you would. You Americans and your guns.

ZenZhu · Coadjutor Joined: 22 Mar 2004 Posts: 475

this sort of language is kind of extreme for what we are talking about here. Furries often don't use discretion, but let's be realistic here, often other people go out actively looking for stuff, find it, then come back talking about people not using discretion. He isnt plastering this stuff in bus terminals.

I was talking more in general. Dyuh. Fisk as an artist is so inept that he doesn't register much on the radar. I was referring to folks who DO want to create something Maplethorpe-esque and frame it in a bus terminal, or wear a fursuit with dildos for nipples in the parking lot of the Hilton, or the folks that feel it's their gawd-given right to sit in Hardee's wearing a Smith & Wesson.

In other words, the first amendment especially seems to be most frequently invoked by people that exercise that freedom without discretion, get called to the carpet for doing something stupid, and then don't want to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.