Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Crush...Yiff...Destroy!
The CYD Forum Archive
 

EWS opens porn site
   Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Forum Archive Index -> Chit Chat
Author Message
Rankin
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 1514

Posted: 11/28/2004 3:28:24 AM     Post subject: EWS opens porn site  

No, I'm not kidding.

Eric is trying to join the ranks of Bernal and the other furry-porn-less-than free-ilk.

A cursory examination states:

"Fur After Dark was built by Eric Schwartz, and showcases his artwork and comics, many of which are not available anywhere else. Another featured artist of Fur After Dark is the insanely talented Max the Black Rabbit, and his exclusive art and comic work will be available here as well. This site will also have artwork by other guest artists in the future.

It's early yet, but Fur After Dark is set to become a prime source for sexy anthro art and other diversions. Don't believe us? Just continue to the next page for a tiny taste of what can be found in the site itself
".


Oh, goody. So now EWS is milking his friends, as well as his fans, to try to turn a quick buck on his old dumps.

..what do you want to bet the first 'guest' artist will be TDK?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 11/28/2004 3:53:35 AM     Post subject:  

I can understand jerking off to it when its free, but a pay site?! Whomever pays for this needs to put down the hand lotion and go outside. Walk off that huge gut of yours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Computolio
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 631

Posted: 11/28/2004 3:59:01 AM     Post subject:  

Well, people who pay for porn are morons, and most furries are morons, so it works out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rankin
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 1514

Posted: 11/28/2004 3:59:56 AM     Post subject:  

I can understand jerking off to it when its free, but a pay site?!


Thank you for entirely missing the point of the post. This is EWS, the guy who says wether or not you are allowed to do a 'tasteful' buttshot of his characters, promoting this!

Footnote: Dark Katte, the mascot of this side, is aparrently the 'girlfriend' of our very own Tamar.. Dammit, Shawntae, I lovereed U!11!!!! :cry:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lazarian
Qualificator
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 21

Posted: 11/28/2004 4:34:33 AM     Post subject:  

As an amusing sidenote, he can't seem to do anything without flaunting his fanatical obsession with Commodore Amigas...

This website created and designed by Eric W. Schwartz ©2004. HTML files and web graphics created using Amiga computers and software. All artworks are copyrighted to their respective creators

-new poster-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 11/28/2004 4:35:35 AM     Post subject:  

I'm not surprised.

Unfortunately, the only stuff that sells in the furry fandom is sex. The raunchier, the better. This was the only alternative Eric has to survive, since, unfortunately, his name is so tainted with his afiliation to furry fandom that the chances he's got to get a career as an animator are near to nil.

It's a damn shame, because Eric was a talented person, and his style could have fit any big studio well. He instead decided to become a popular character on the furry fandom, and thus he gradually erotized his style, starting with curvy female funny animals at first to then draw them naked to then make them have sex to then make them have kinky sex... I think we all know the history.

Nowadays, he seems unable to draw anything without sexualizing it...



Anyway, I think he still has the chance to leave all this crap, to stop drawing stuff that appeal a few hundreds of people to draw things with appeal to millions, to leave the fandom and find a job as a graphic designer, cartoonist or animator. Trouble is...

... he doesn't want to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/28/2004 6:32:13 AM     Post subject:  

Wel, people who pay for porn are morons, and most furries are morons, so it works out.


If your talking about furry and hentai porn shit , sure


I dont really look at porn enough to have tons of info, but I'd think it'd be way less of a hassle to go to a porn shop than fuck around with poor quality (this is relative I guess) and pop ups and spy ware and all the other nonsense with the internet. A friend of mine subscribes to that suicidegirls site, and I've used his account. Id definatly say that site is worth the money, if you're interested in that sort of thing. He also subscribes to that bangbus site, which is apperently pretty humorous too.

Anyway. thats just my opinion. Stuff thats free is usually free for a reason. Namely that someone couldn't make money off it. Not that you are always getting something good if you pay...

Its where Im at with mp3s.. im sick of queue's , shit quality, misslabeled songs and poor availability. Id rather just go to the record store or use one of those pay services for a song or an album Im looking for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Computolio
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 631

Posted: 11/28/2004 7:11:10 AM     Post subject:  


Anyway, I think he still has the chance to leave all this crap, to stop drawing stuff that appeal a few hundreds of people to draw things with appeal to millions, to leave the fandom and find a job as a graphic designer, cartoonist or animator. Trouble is...

... he doesn't want to.


Dude, he couldn't even if he wanted to. There's no room for him in the animation industry and his furry exploits are far too well-known. That, and his artistic range is not quite as wide as it may seem (have you SEEN him try to draw a human lately?).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gargoyle
Vociferator
Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 387

Posted: 11/28/2004 11:20:11 AM     Post subject:  

Black Eric's evil alter ego, his dark half,
TDK
finally won.

Or he just took this to the heart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gargoyle
Vociferator
Joined: 04 Sep 2004
Posts: 387

Posted: 11/28/2004 11:29:57 AM     Post subject:  

Nowadays, he seems unable to draw anything without sexualizing it...



it's one of the most sickening non-yiffy furry pictures I ever seen. Really. It almost made me vomit. I think it's these colors and the... lizard... br...

...excuse me for a moment.

Edited for:
OK, I'm fine now. I just needed a glass of water.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 11/28/2004 11:41:59 AM     Post subject:  

With all the secrect identities, it'd seem he's gotten no further than me openly admitting ... stuff.. <=)
But sure, the companies might be more prudish over there...

I still try to get back to a real animation job... even if it wasn't anything fancy! Hasn't been for the last 4 years... but it's been fun! =).
It does seem everyone who claims have worked at disney don't get much appreciation from youse guys!

Damn Aboa Animation never rises from it's ashes...
Boss is too keen on playing round with his boiscouts, rather than running his company! >=)
Bleh!

http://www.heliograph-designs.co.uk/users/nosocs/display.php?strip=596&screen=43
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DA
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 595

Posted: 11/28/2004 4:15:16 PM     Post subject:  

(have you SEEN him try to draw a human lately?).


Why? what do his humans look like? I don't think I've ever seen him draw one.


BTW: I suppose the best that can be said for that site is at least he knows how to draw without it looking like roadkill, I've seen pay sites for some of the most inept furry porn ever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mitch
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 473

Posted: 11/28/2004 4:52:40 PM     Post subject:  

(have you SEEN him try to draw a human lately?).


Why? what do his humans look like? I don't think I've ever seen him draw one.

Here ya go! Mascot by Eric for DiscreetFX plugin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 11/28/2004 5:11:27 PM     Post subject:  

Nice eyelashes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/28/2004 8:46:35 PM     Post subject:  

Ya know everytime I see that DiscreetFX art Eric did .. I just cannot get over how terribly fucked the legs are in that picture.

It almost seems like a mistake. Like he shouldve fixed that before he sent them the pic. Maybe its because someone here a while ago pointed out that Eric cannot draw human legs or something but thats all I can see in that pic now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Prattler
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 104

Posted: 11/28/2004 9:44:56 PM     Post subject:  

Thank you for entirely missing the point of the post. This is EWS, the guy who says wether or not you are allowed to do a 'tasteful' buttshot of his characters, promoting this!


Sabrina - Female skunk, short white hair, wears glasses.
Sabrina is shy and easily embarrassed, and enjoys collecting and computers.
Nudity: Sabrina is rarely fully unclothed, but may be depicted in the nude, but only 'tastefully' and not explicitly so. No visible nipples or genitalia. Her fur covers those areas on her body.
Sexuality: If Sabrina is to be depicted in sexual contact, it should only be with her boyfriend, R.C. The raccoon, or possibly Chris Foxx, from the fanfiction continuity (Contact writer Chris Yost for permission in this case) No explicit depictions of sex. Sexual contact should be soft and downplayed, preferably obscured or 'under the covers'
Note: If you wish to do a public work with Sabrina in the nude or in a sexual situation, please check with me first before posting it.


Gee, and I have TDK porn of Sabrina here. Go figure.

Oh Eric-chan. -_-;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skunkfuckers Inc.
Needs to get out more
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 980

Posted: 11/28/2004 9:56:01 PM     Post subject:  

Ya know everytime I see that DiscreetFX art Eric did .. I just cannot get over how terribly fucked the legs are in that picture.

It almost seems like a mistake. Like he shouldve fixed that before he sent them the pic. Maybe its because someone here a while ago pointed out that Eric cannot draw human legs or something but thats all I can see in that pic now.

What's the differance between how (non-digitigrade) 'furry' legs would be drawn versus human legs? Aren't they pretty much the same? I don't see much wrong with the anatomy there, it's just a bit over-stylized like one of the later Warner Bros. characters (think Freakazoid!, or Hello Nurse from Animaniacs). Some of the Justice League Unlimited related series also have that problem from time to time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/28/2004 11:41:17 PM     Post subject:  

What's the differance between how (non-digitigrade) 'furry' legs would be drawn versus human legs? Aren't they pretty much the same?



Right, there wouldnt be a difference.


I don't see much wrong with the anatomy there, it's just a bit over-stylized like one of the later Warner Bros. characters (think Freakazoid!, or Hello Nurse from Animaniacs). Some of the Justice League Unlimited related series also have that problem from time to time.


Id agree looking at the overall picture. But look at the leg thats prominent. Look at the knee area or the shape. It looks way off to me every single time I see it. Its probably mostly because he has that little line that comes into the leg shape at the knee. It creates some weird perspective or something
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dogthing
Vociferator
Joined: 26 Oct 2003
Posts: 522

Posted: 11/29/2004 1:19:26 AM     Post subject:  

sup bobby :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DA
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 595

Posted: 11/29/2004 1:24:24 AM     Post subject:  



Id agree looking at the overall picture. But look at the leg thats prominent. Look at the knee area or the shape. It looks way off to me every single time I see it. Its probably mostly because he has that little line that comes into the leg shape at the knee. It creates some weird perspective or something


My first thought was that she had no knee's, the legs look mushy and boneless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wayd Wolf
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 588

Posted: 11/29/2004 2:21:24 AM     Post subject:  

Ok, so Eric IS fucked between the ears, yes? More for the pay-per-porn or for the content? You decide.

Hottie? If those calves were any larger, you could get some veal.

All in all, the continuing crisis continues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Computolio
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 631

Posted: 11/29/2004 3:43:03 AM     Post subject:  


Gee, and I have TDK porn of Sabrina here. Go figure.

Oh Eric-chan. -_-;


SHARE AND ENJOY
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/29/2004 5:17:52 AM     Post subject:  

Ok, so Eric IS fucked between the ears, yes? More for the pay-per-porn or for the content? You decide.


I decide both.

I think Eric's furry art is good, even his porn is good artistically speaking, the content of those images is usually uh... highly questionable. Thats if you don't consider plain ol' furry porn highly questionable to begin with.

Also - pretty sad if this is the best idea he can come up with for making money. He has the training and background for animation. Why doesnt he make a adult furry cartoon like some of those hentai films they sell now? Thats a field right there thats wide open. Whoever does it first (my bet right now is on Adam Wan) could probably make a fair amount of money from DVD sales, so long as they used thier head - or were at least a semi-competent businessman. If you cant sell furry stuff to furries, then that would seem to indicate a problem somewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 11/29/2004 5:42:28 AM     Post subject:  

This website created and designed by Eric W. Schwartz ©2004. HTML files and web graphics created using Amiga computers and software. All artworks are copyrighted to their respective creators

Translation: This website created and designed by Eric W. "TDK" Schwartz. HTML files and web graphics created using two Lithuanian midgets and a shaved weasel duct-taped to the backside of a TRS-80 and strapped to a blender with an Army-issue mesh belt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 11/29/2004 7:01:44 AM     Post subject: Re: EWS opens porn site  

No, I'm not kidding.

Eric is trying to join the ranks of Bernal and the other furry-porn-less-than free-ilk.

A cursory examination states:

"Fur After Dark was built by Eric Schwartz, and showcases his artwork and comics, many of which are not available anywhere else. Another featured artist of Fur After Dark is the insanely talented Max the Black Rabbit, and his exclusive art and comic work will be available here as well. This site will also have artwork by other guest artists in the future.

It's early yet, but Fur After Dark is set to become a prime source for sexy anthro art and other diversions. Don't believe us? Just continue to the next page for a tiny taste of what can be found in the site itself
".


Oh, goody. So now EWS is milking his friends, as well as his fans, to try to turn a quick buck on his old dumps.

..what do you want to bet the first 'guest' artist will be TDK?


It's America. If nothing else, you just helped give him free advertisement,cause I sure didn't know about it until I saw this post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 11/29/2004 7:04:22 AM     Post subject:  

I can understand jerking off to it when its free, but a pay site?!


Thank you for entirely missing the point of the post. This is EWS, the guy who says wether or not you are allowed to do a 'tasteful' buttshot of his characters, promoting this!

Footnote: Dark Katte, the mascot of this side, is aparrently the 'girlfriend' of our very own Tamar.. Dammit, Shawntae, I lovereed U!11!!!! :cry:


Like what you'd consider Hypocracy or not, a creator still has a right to say how they'd like to have their creation used. I know it's not exactly the most PC thing to say, but, you make it you should say how it should be used.

Not the most popular thing to say, but bottom line still true. You don't give up your right to what you make just because you put it out there. Granted, things are done I wouldn't do, but then that's my personal choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 11/29/2004 7:08:01 AM     Post subject:  

I can understand jerking off to it when its free, but a pay site?!


Thank you for entirely missing the point of the post. This is EWS, the guy who says wether or not you are allowed to do a 'tasteful' buttshot of his characters, promoting this!

Footnote: Dark Katte, the mascot of this side, is aparrently the 'girlfriend' of our very own Tamar.. Dammit, Shawntae, I lovereed U!11!!!! :cry:


Oh and sorry to double post but I missed the bottom part.

Dark Katte the character was to be used as Tamar's, the character, girlfriend when I was trying to do an online comic. I got permission to use her back then, but I only got maybe 7 strips into the comic and realized I liked doing full comic books over short story comic strips.

Tamar to me is nothing more than just a cartoon character that I sometiems use as a avatar or visual representation when on the net, like many other cartoonist do when they want to self insert themselves into their work. John Bryne and Chris Clarmont used to have themselves drawn into Marvel comic stories they did all the time, that's where I got the idea from personally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 11/29/2004 10:22:48 PM     Post subject:  


Dude, he couldn't even if he wanted to. There's no room for him in the animation industry and his furry exploits are far too well-known.

I don't get your point of his furry exploits are too well-known. If EWS drew humans and was a popular underground comic artist his underground exploits would just add to his portfolio. There are a number of artist in the animation and comic industry that came from the underground and for the most parts their employers don't care as long as the can follow their orders.

Face it EWS is normal when you put him next to the likes Steve Purcell or John Kricfalusi (You seen the new Ren&Stimpy he did on Spike TV?). Purcells comic was turned into a (short lived) animated series, was this because Purcells underground explots was done in the comic commnity and not the furry community?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLaitila
Vociferator
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 408

Posted: 11/29/2004 11:00:42 PM     Post subject:  

Would their material make Mike Diana blush?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skunkfuckers Inc.
Needs to get out more
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 980

Posted: 11/29/2004 11:39:54 PM     Post subject:  

I could actually see Sabrina Online as one of the few popular things from the fandom that could be picked up as an animated sitcom and turned into something good, but it couldn't stay 'furry', it would just suck. You'd also have to drop the insipid Amiga obsession which NOONE would get, and just have Sabrina be an all-around cute computer geek. Also, Zig Zag could stay a bisexual big-titty porn star (or as I like to call her, a "walking semen recepticle"), but her character -and all the characters, really- would have to be fleshed out in ways I don't think Eric would be capable of doing. You see, the most important tool a writer can have is life experiance, and furries have that in scant quantity.

There's just a certain lameness to furry that's hard to describe, but can be felt, expecially by some of the more intelligent people like myself who are aware of furry/anti-furry but are themselves above the muck, looking down from that plateau known as "the real world".

And I don't have problem with him doing a porn site, that's not the hipocrisy, because he does have every right to protect his creations and that can't really be argued against. The real hipocrisy is in the true reason why he uses his "TDK" persona; not because he likes drawing porn (which he openly does plenty of as Eric W. Schwartz anyway) but because he likes drawing fanart of copyrighted characters and is seemingly ashamed or fearful of not having a leg to stand on if confronted with his own hipocrisy. He couldn't so easily justify protecting his own creations when he's drawing Gadget Hackwrench being screwed buy actual metal screws; so if Sabrina porn started flying all over the place, in some ways he'd be getting all of what he set himself up for.

So the site is in the clear, but the man is not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/30/2004 5:28:08 AM     Post subject:  


Dude, he couldn't even if he wanted to. There's no room for him in the animation industry and his furry exploits are far too well-known.

I don't get your point of his furry exploits are too well-known. If EWS drew humans and was a popular underground comic artist his underground exploits would just add to his portfolio.



If someone's 'underground exploits' are good, they can add to their portfolio. Erics TDK stuff is a complete embarassment, only partially because what it is - mostly because he's an ass.

The flipside of that is someone with enough charisma and backbone could probably work the fact that they had done even furry porn to thier advantage somehow. Im positive of it. Its all about how you act and what you say to people and very little else matters.

Its a skill very few people have (I don't), even harder to aquire (I'm trying), but if you do you can influence people and get what you want, or do anything you want, and no one will say anything about it.


There are a number of artist in the animation and comic industry that came from the underground and for the most parts their employers don't care as long as the can follow their orders.


Right, but as the subject of half the threads and articles on this site, furries by and large tend to be absolute cripples when it comes to any social situation. They dont get the animation jobs (or whatever) not because they drew furry porn or are furries - they don't get the job cuz they blow the interview bigtime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 11/30/2004 5:58:07 AM     Post subject:  


There are a number of artist in the animation and comic industry that came from the underground and for the most parts their employers don't care as long as the can follow their orders.


Right, but as the subject of half the threads and articles on this site, furries by and large tend to be absolute cripples when it comes to any social situation. They dont get the animation jobs (or whatever) not because they drew furry porn or are furries - they don't get the job cuz they blow the interview bigtime.

You can say that about the community it self, it is mostly just a sub of the larger comic community yet tries to go it alone and puts a wall to the rest of the comic community. Think how more logical it would be if you went to a Comic Con and there was furry artists tring to sell to comics to comic readers instead of just the furry community. Take Sam&Max the main characters are a dog and a rabbit yet most of Sam&Maxs fans are outside the furry community.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/30/2004 6:08:23 AM     Post subject:  

You can say that about the community it self, it is mostly just a sub of the larger comic community yet tries to go it alone and puts a wall to the rest of the comic community. Think how more logical it would be if you went to a Comic Con and there was furry artists tring to sell to comics to comic readers instead of just the furry community. Take Sam&Max the main characters are a dog and a rabbit yet most of Sam&Maxs fans are outside the furry community.



Thats what I've been saying forever.

I think furry fandom should be dissolved and its components bitchslapped back into its respecting subgenres of SF/F, comics and Anime.

Maybe they could try again someday when they are ready
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 11/30/2004 9:19:46 AM     Post subject:  


You can say that about the community it self, it is mostly just a sub of the larger comic community yet tries to go it alone and puts a wall to the rest of the comic community. Think how more logical it would be if you went to a Comic Con and there was furry artists tring to sell to comics to comic readers instead of just the furry community. Take Sam&Max the main characters are a dog and a rabbit yet most of Sam&Maxs fans are outside the furry community.


Well, yeah, that's one of the biggest problems of the furry fandom. Furry stuff is -only- appealing for furries.

Many of the furry artists could try doing stuff not exclusively aimed to furries, with less emphasis on furry trends and in-jokes (excessive erotization of characters, creation of universes way different to the one we live in, exploration of whider themes to be told in a history, formulaic plots, etc), so their creations may be enjoyed by a wider audience. Furry asrtists are endogamous, so they don't realize that their stuff is hardly attractive for anybody outside the fandom.

They would also get a more decent coverage if, instead of orbiting only the fandom and its established sites (furnation, furbid, yerf, etc), they went and tried some exposure from other websites (http://www.toon.com/ , http://www.comixpedia.com , etc) furry stuff could have a broader exposure and would manage to improve its image.

Alas, it's unlikely that will happen, because that would mean, among other things, leaving fetishes and other quirks private. And many furs prefer to be vocal (and loud) about those.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 11/30/2004 3:33:20 PM     Post subject:  


Alas, it's unlikely that will happen, because that would mean, among other things, leaving fetishes and other quirks private. And many furs prefer to be vocal (and loud) about those.

They don't have to hide it, it is not like anything the furry community can throw at the erotica sub of the comic community can upset them. The only thing is they just remeber in the comic community to keep their fetishes to erotica.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 11/30/2004 4:23:37 PM     Post subject:  


Dude, he couldn't even if he wanted to. There's no room for him in the animation industry and his furry exploits are far too well-known.

I don't get your point of his furry exploits are too well-known. If EWS drew humans and was a popular underground comic artist his underground exploits would just add to his portfolio.

If someone's 'underground exploits' are good, they can add to their portfolio. Erics TDK stuff is a complete embarassment, only partially because what it is - mostly because he's an ass.

There's also a difference between being "underground," and Eric's rips of Minvera Mink getting tentacle raped. If his work as TDK was limited to his own characters, he could pass it off as "underground." But, if a potential employer catches wind of his work as TDK, that presents the image of someone that not only obsesses a little too much on cartoon animal poon, but also does not respect the intellectual properties of other studios. That's a little like hiring a convicted bank robber to work as a bank teller.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Baird
Prattler
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 133

Posted: 11/30/2004 4:51:18 PM     Post subject:  

But, if a potential employer catches wind of his work as TDK, that presents the image of someone that not only obsesses a little too much on cartoon animal poon

Schwartz I believe has already lost a gig with Gateway (back when they had the Amiga properties) for that very reason. I find it very likely that he's never actally going to have a real job in the animation industry (it's been like 8 years since he graduated?), and I see the pay site as a concession to that.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 551

Posted: 11/30/2004 5:48:28 PM     Post subject:  

Estrugo nailed down the problem there; some furry artists, like Schwartz, could very well apply their skills in "normal" anthropomorphic art that would hold wider appeal, but they either don't want to, or they simply can't.

If they choose not to, because they like the cesspool of furrydumb, well fine, their choice. But somehow I can't help but think that the two reasons for furry artists being unable to get "real" work that mouse and ZenZhu mentioned - social ineptitude or disrespect for copyright law - are traits that are nurtured, indirectly even encouraged, in furry circles. Lesson: If you have applicable art talent, get out of furrydumb while you can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wayd Wolf
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 588

Posted: 11/30/2004 6:50:04 PM     Post subject:  

From what I've seen, there's a more of a tendency than ever before for people to give up and feel sorry for themselves, refuse to see opportunities, etc. People less and less well deal with setbacks in life.

Teens are like that to begin with in any era, but never more than now. The angsty goth crap is just one permutation.

Furries are more prone to the above than most people to begin with. Goes with being victim-centric introverts. And they stay that way for years if not decades.

So what do you get? People who despite their ability to deal with technical and artistic things very well in their own little narrow area can't bring themselves to buckle down and deal with the rest of life, see impossibilities where others see possibilities, refuse to attempt to win for fear of losing and by so doing ensure failure, etc.

I stopped putting my writing online largely due to furries not grasping my intent of it and insisting on furry inside crap. When I wrote comedy, people wanted sex and violence. When I wrote violence, people wanted sex and comedy. I don't write sex scenes very well and when I've tried they've seemed as bad as those I've read on porn story sites. Bleah. So what's the point of even trying, especially when real life pressures are building? More disincentive and less incentive.

The only way the talented survive in furry is to jettison more and more real life, work more and more tightly to furry cliche, and that means less and less ability to survive and prosper outside in real life.

Hence we have Schwartz who SHOULD have gotten a decent gig a long time ago but...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 11/30/2004 7:08:29 PM     Post subject:  


There's also a difference between being "underground," and Eric's rips of Minvera Mink getting tentacle raped. If his work as TDK was limited to his own characters, he could pass it off as "underground." But, if a potential employer catches wind of his work as TDK, that presents the image of someone that not only obsesses a little too much on cartoon animal poon, but also does not respect the intellectual properties of other studios. That's a little like hiring a convicted bank robber to work as a bank teller.

That and the lack of a secret underground for the furry community. While for the comic community you have secret invitation only FTP sites (so the artists don't get burned) for works that break copyrights and a culture of not distrabuting such illegal works it doesn't work that way for the furry community.

Thus if Schwartz hung around the comic community odds are his incriminating works would be only be on secret FTP servers and known by a select few that keep their mouth shut or lose access to the server.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 11/30/2004 7:19:13 PM     Post subject:  

That's a little like hiring a convicted bank robber to work as a bank teller.


Back when I was 14-15-16 years old I was getting mixed up in all sorts of credit card related..stuff ( :wink: ). A few years down the road from that, Im working with credit cards every single day with access to databases with millions of accounts with all the information I could ever dream of getting back then. Only now all that info is worthless to me, things change.

or, CANT A MAN START OVER !?! :)

Schwartz I believe has already lost a gig with Gateway (back when they had the Amiga properties) for that very reason.


I wouldn't be so sure. At least, it depends on why. If they just found out from a rumor or something that he did cartoon porn, they cant fire somebody for that. If they did do that he should have gone directly to the Department of Labor over it. Now if he did some stupid shit like was drawing it at work or something thats a different story.

Also just in general here, again, you guys are thinking about the whole furry aspect of this too much.

I have work in a few hours. If I printed out some furry porn and taped it up at my cubicle - I would probably get fired over that shit. It wouldn't be because it was furry, or that it was weird or whatever. It would be because its explicit sexual material that has no business in the workplace. People have gotten into trouble over swimsuit calandars. Actual porn would be so blatant a violation, they'd probably just terminate your employment without warning. The exact same thing would happen if I dug up one of the Club porn mags I have somewhere and cut out a page and hung that up. I had a friend almost get fired because he showed a female friend (and an former stripper, mind you), jokingly, an ad in a local paper looking for porn actresses. It was a private conversation between those two that included no one else - but someone overheard it.

Corporate office environments here in the states, its all about watching what you say to people and who might be around to get offended by it. (or alternately, who can you get into trouble for soemthing they might have overlooked). Theres always some fuck in an office who likes to run down to HR every 5 minutes and file a complaint against someone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 11/30/2004 7:21:41 PM     Post subject:  

That and furry still has something of a stigma compared to, say, She Hulk. She may be big and green, but she's at least human.... so more folks can understand seeing her as sexy as opposed to a purple cartoon skunk. Even alien babes... even IF furry... have a bit more coverage under the notion of IDIC to your non-furry types as opposed to your typical furry alternate reality where, effectively, we all wake up as some kind of fuzzy doppleganger.

I'm not saying it makes sense or is justifiable.. but it seems to me half-naked skunk babe from some distant planet (Mavel's character of Hepzibah) is still held in slightly higher esteem than some half naked skunk babe from an alternate universe where everything is just as it is now, only everyone's a walking-talking animal. Maybe it's due to one of the typical lines you see drawn between furry and non-furry anthro stuff..... non-furry anthros are treated as a novelty.... furry anthros are obsessed upon. :?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 11/30/2004 9:09:22 PM     Post subject:  

That's a little like hiring a convicted bank robber to work as a bank teller.


Back when I was 14-15-16 years old I was getting mixed up in all sorts of credit card related..stuff ( :wink: ). A few years down the road from that, Im working with credit cards every single day with access to databases with millions of accounts with all the information I could ever dream of getting back then. Only now all that info is worthless to me, things change.

or, CANT A MAN START OVER !?! :)


Speaking of that, some hackers got jobs as securtiy advisors because they got caught hacking into big systems like NASA. Of course they are suppose to be reformed and over hacking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/1/2004 3:55:38 AM     Post subject:  

You can say that about the community it self, it is mostly just a sub of the larger comic community yet tries to go it alone and puts a wall to the rest of the comic community. Think how more logical it would be if you went to a Comic Con and there was furry artists tring to sell to comics to comic readers instead of just the furry community. Take Sam&Max the main characters are a dog and a rabbit yet most of Sam&Maxs fans are outside the furry community.



Thats what I've been saying forever.

I think furry fandom should be dissolved and its components bitchslapped back into its respecting subgenres of SF/F, comics and Anime.

Maybe they could try again someday when they are ready


But that's what I've been saying, the whole concept that a fandom is something that can be bitchslapped is crazy. It's not a living entity, a fandom is just a group of people that happen to have a simliar interest in something. There's totally nothing organized about it, otherwise a place like this full of furry (in relation to liking anthro stuff) 'fans' wouldn't exist. There isn't even a 100% agreed on definition of just what furry means/is.

A fandom only is what the people in it choose to make it. If a bunch of people said, furry is liking cartoon animals that have humaniod form and enough of them get together agreeing on that way of thinking, then poof, you got a fandom.

I don't know why people keep insisting there's this big corporate like being out there called furry that is contoled by some big wig behind a curtain.

Frankly, I think sometimes you all on both sides take this stuff way to seriously, if you even get to that point to begin with. It's friggin cartoon animals people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 12/1/2004 4:57:53 AM     Post subject:  


But that's what I've been saying, the whole concept that a fandom is something that can be bitchslapped is crazy. It's not a living entity, a fandom is just a group of people that happen to have a simliar interest in something. There's totally nothing organized about it, otherwise a place like this full of furry (in relation to liking anthro stuff) 'fans' wouldn't exist. There isn't even a 100% agreed on definition of just what furry means/is.

A fandom only is what the people in it choose to make it. If a bunch of people said, furry is liking cartoon animals that have humaniod form and enough of them get together agreeing on that way of thinking, then poof, you got a fandom.

I don't know why people keep insisting there's this big corporate like being out there called furry that is contoled by some big wig behind a curtain.

Frankly, I think sometimes you all on both sides take this stuff way to seriously, if you even get to that point to begin with. It's friggin cartoon animals people.

The point is I find it is easier to talk about furry outside the furry community then in. For example comic cons are much bigger (Comic Cons usally host the anime and animation community) and I can talk about Watership Down,Sam&Max Secret of NIMH, Animals of Farthing-Wood,ect without being limmited to furry meaning it is wide enough to also talk about Megas XLR, Justice Leage, Fairly Odd Parents,ect as the community is more rounded.

Oh you can meet artist in the industry like Paul Dini. Basicly worth the time and money to go to a Comic Con.

On the flip side the furry community is focused on it self making the convetions mean spending money and time to ONLY see and talk about furry with mostly people that make comic nerds look cool and you feel kinda sad for the artist hooking up to the community that are selling them selves short. Sure the furry community will rub their ego and tell them how great they are but furry is not as big of a market as the comic community.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/1/2004 4:01:46 PM     Post subject:  


But that's what I've been saying, the whole concept that a fandom is something that can be bitchslapped is crazy. It's not a living entity, a fandom is just a group of people that happen to have a simliar interest in something. There's totally nothing organized about it, otherwise a place like this full of furry (in relation to liking anthro stuff) 'fans' wouldn't exist. There isn't even a 100% agreed on definition of just what furry means/is.

A fandom only is what the people in it choose to make it. If a bunch of people said, furry is liking cartoon animals that have humaniod form and enough of them get together agreeing on that way of thinking, then poof, you got a fandom.

While a fandom isn't a single entity, it is controllable, like any other group, from within. While there may not be some council of elders plotting the fate of the fandom, the decisions of the individuals comprising the group direct its actions. For example, you're sitting around at a friend's house with 15 other people. You collectively decide you are hungry, and muse where to eat. There isn't some bigwig at the helm, prodding everyone to go to Shuckey Joe's Pizza Parlor... but... it's also unlikely every single member of that group is doing to disperse to the restaurants of their choosing and then meet back up later. Chances are, the group will reach some kind of consensus that directs its decision-making process and resulting actions.

Likewise, while furrydom is basically a loosely-bound group of people brought together by an interest in anthros, the decisions and actions of the furry fandom.. the group... are formed by consensus and majority rule.

Now, obviously in the case of something like bestiality, the majority rule may not necessarily dictate that furry will promote it... but, the consensus of the group, by and large, seems to be that it will also not actively put down those people or factions that associate bestiality with furrydom. Your logic looks good on paper, but it doesn't pan out in reality. If the social mechnics of furrydom followed what you suggested, other fandoms, such as anime, Star Trek, Star Wars, sci-fi in general, fantasy, etc., would also bear the burden of stigmas set upon them by those frings factions that like tentacle rape, Klingon bondage, Stormtrooper locker room gang bangs, etc. Even with anime and hentai, you never see as much association between general anime fans and tentacle rape as you do between furry fans and "skunkfuckers."

And, really, there are people that exert more control over the fandom at large than others...... the artists. In a fandom that is largely based around imagery, the artists and those that organize the artists, such as the operators of VCL, have a fair bit of sway in setting the tone for what is considered part of the fandom. When fans see the more visible artists like Terrie Smith, Tygger, Chris Sawyer, Doug Winger, Max Black Rabbit, Eric Schwartz and crew producing copious amounts of furry wank material, then that sets the tone for what the more amateurish fans will produce. When the operators of sites like VCL allow just about anything to be posted in the way of kinks and fetishes, that likewise helps set the trend that diaper fetishes, scat, and bestiality are okey dokey among the furry ranks. When the less talented fans seeking notice see someone like yourself, Tamar, drawing doggie cock in the shower, and they see the response it generates, they are more likely to hop on the bandwagon. Monkey see. Monkey do.

So, really, there are movers and shakers that help set the tone for the fandom.. the artists. And with most of your more prominent artists producing mature work to varying degrees.. be it somewhat limited like your VCL selection, or more prolific porn hounds like Doug Winger... it overshadows the very talented artists that produce very little, if any, work that could be considered adult, such as Ursula Vernon (her own website features nude women in fantasy art, but I have yet to see her produce anything blatantly adult in the realm of furry stuff). The growing fanbase among people too young to legally buy adult material doesn't help the mix any when you offer them up free porn on VCL. It just encourages them to fixate on the easily-obtainable adult material and produce their own. Like I said, monkey see.. monkey do. If the artists and the operators of image sites like VCL and Furnation made an effort to squelch the fetish art and all... be a little more Yerf-like... they could exert a decent influence over furrydom's direction and image. But, then, that would be intolerant and censorship.. and that would be oh so very bad. So... furry becomes more and more known for porn like you see choking up VCL, and Yerf becomes something of an oddity.. rather than vice versa.

You're right in that there isn't any one person or group that can be bitch-smacked to turn furrydom around. But, furry as a group could form a consensus to improve its image.. it just doesn't want to. Suggesting you can't hold furrydom accountable for its actions and image because it's just a loosely-bound group of people that like anthros is kind of like saying you can't hold the KKK responsible for its actions because it's just a loosely-bound group of people that all happen to vehemently hate anyone that's not a white Christian.

It's friggin cartoon animals people.

No kidding.. so why are so many folks drawing them with dripping doggie cocks?

The point is I find it is easier to talk about furry outside the furry community then in. For example comic cons are much bigger (Comic Cons usally host the anime and animation community) and I can talk about Watership Down,Sam&Max Secret of NIMH, Animals of Farthing-Wood,ect without being limmited to furry meaning it is wide enough to also talk about Megas XLR, Justice Leage, Fairly Odd Parents,ect as the community is more rounded.

See, the trouble that would present to furries, is that, while you can talk about quality examples of anthropomorphism in comics, literature, and cartoons..... such a setting would mean you can't talk about "happywriggles," scritches, your misplaced dragon spirit, or how you have to wear Depends because you've let your dog fuck you in the ass too many times. And, for furries, if you can't talk about that stuff... what's the point? I once heard some friends at a comic shop talking about a gal they met at DragonCon in Atlanta that apparently believed she was a Vorlon that had had her memory largely wiped and was sentenced for some transgression to live in a human body on Earth.

See, if you walk into a room full of furries and say something like that, you will get a lot of folks agreeing that is entirely possible, and maybe even a few that suddenly decide they might be in a similar predicament. Walk into a room full of your average SF fans and say that, and you will get laughed out of the room.... and probably told by a few how such a thing is a scientific impossibility according to Babylon 5 canon.

On the flip side the furry community is focused on it self making the convetions mean spending money and time to ONLY see and talk about furry with mostly people that make comic nerds look cool and you feel kinda sad for the artist hooking up to the community that are selling them selves short. Sure the furry community will rub their ego and tell them how great they are but furry is not as big of a market as the comic community.

There's another kicker... furrydom couldn't survive in the average comic community. Not only would it be such a niche market as to have no way of stacking up against comics in general, but most "professional" furry artists couldn't keep up with the work pace of the comic/fantasy art world in general. That'd be kind of like a little league T-ball player trying to cut it at the World Series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Baird
Prattler
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 133

Posted: 12/1/2004 4:08:08 PM     Post subject:  

Thus if Schwartz hung around the comic community odds are his incriminating works would be only be on secret FTP servers and known by a select few that keep their mouth shut or lose access to the server.

Sites like Pegasus do not exist. Truth. Anyway, DVD-Rs through the mail are the preferred medium of the scene-- no bandwidth or ISP traffic monitoring to worry about, for starters, and there's also the finer control on who receives the content.

Ooh, I've said too much. Where's my MIB memory-eraser flashy thingie...

I wouldn't be so sure. At least, it depends on why. If they just found out from a rumor or something that he did cartoon porn, they cant fire somebody for that.

The situtation was that Gateway were seriously planning on making Amy the Squirrel an official brand for the post-Commodore Amiga products.... unfortunately, EWS had done a few too many Mature Content pics of the Squirrel and associated characters, and that killed the idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nothingkat
Qualificator
Joined: 30 Mar 2004
Posts: 19

Posted: 12/1/2004 4:21:22 PM     Post subject:  

The growing fanbase among people too young to legally buy adult material doesn't help the mix any when you offer them up free porn on VCL. It just encourages them to fixate on the easily-obtainable adult material and produce their own. Like I said, monkey see.. monkey do.


Yep, pretty much agree on that completely. I've seen new furs as low as the age of 11 enter this fandom and the furry porn stuff is NO surprise to them apparently. In fact, I'm almost down to believe that the furry porn attracts more people to check out this fandom than the whole "inner animal" schtick.

Then, of course, once they feel they can draw well enough, they go right ahead and start selling their stuff on Furbid or what not which further recycles the whole thing all over again. They had this ball rolling a good, what, 10 years now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/1/2004 4:38:11 PM     Post subject:  

So the ball rolls ... =)

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sehvekah
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 39

Posted: 12/1/2004 5:33:06 PM     Post subject:  

In fact, I'm almost down to believe that the furry porn attracts more people to check out this fandom than the whole "inner animal" schtick.


No shit. :roll:

That's one thing I have to hand to the furries though, free porn is certianly an effective recrutment strategy(not the best one, given the peoplemisplaced, holy, angst-ridden and ass-kicking animal spirits> it attracts, but ya gotta admit that it works).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 12/1/2004 5:53:36 PM     Post subject:  


The point is I find it is easier to talk about furry outside the furry community then in. For example comic cons are much bigger (Comic Cons usally host the anime and animation community) and I can talk about Watership Down,Sam&Max Secret of NIMH, Animals of Farthing-Wood,ect without being limmited to furry meaning it is wide enough to also talk about Megas XLR, Justice Leage, Fairly Odd Parents,ect as the community is more rounded.

See, the trouble that would present to furries, is that, while you can talk about quality examples of anthropomorphism in comics, literature, and cartoons..... such a setting would mean you can't talk about "happywriggles," scritches, your misplaced dragon spirit, or how you have to wear Depends because you've let your dog fuck you in the ass too many times. And, for furries, if you can't talk about that stuff... what's the point? I once heard some friends at a comic shop talking about a gal they met at DragonCon in Atlanta that apparently believed she was a Vorlon that had had her memory largely wiped and was sentenced for some transgression to live in a human body on Earth.

See, if you walk into a room full of furries and say something like that, you will get a lot of folks agreeing that is entirely possible, and maybe even a few that suddenly decide they might be in a similar predicament. Walk into a room full of your average SF fans and say that, and you will get laughed out of the room.... and probably told by a few how such a thing is a scientific impossibility according to Babylon 5 canon.

And furries wonder why pros don't want anything to do with the furry community. Drooling fan boys (and girls) they can deal with (some artist even drool over their own work) but not the furverts of furrydom, for example I actully ran into someone that wanted to marry Fifi, assuming he was just a normal drooling fan boy I though he was just kidding so I cracked about it wouldn't last long as Fifi will always be chasing after the next skunk hunk and I was took back by the fact he was serious and offeneded by my crack. When he starting talking about wanting to removing his ablity to smell to be with Fifi I wanted to run far far away.

Also even if say EWS lands a studio gig, he would have to give up furrydom or be an loner, his coworkers would rather go to a comic con then be freaked out by the furry community.


On the flip side the furry community is focused on it self making the convetions mean spending money and time to ONLY see and talk about furry with mostly people that make comic nerds look cool and you feel kinda sad for the artist hooking up to the community that are selling them selves short. Sure the furry community will rub their ego and tell them how great they are but furry is not as big of a market as the comic community.

There's another kicker... furrydom couldn't survive in the average comic community. Not only would it be such a niche market as to have no way of stacking up against comics in general, but most "professional" furry artists couldn't keep up with the work pace of the comic/fantasy art world in general. That'd be kind of like a little league T-ball player trying to cut it at the World Series.

I agree the furry community seems to protect artist starting out but when their skills devlop it limmits them and makes it hard for them to jump over to the larger comic community thus they get stuck in the furry community.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/1/2004 7:29:28 PM     Post subject:  

Indeed. There are many talented furry artists out there that could not draw a human to save their life. What they don't realize is to be successful in comics and illustration, you have to be able to draw anything on demand... even if you've never drawn it before.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 12/1/2004 7:39:13 PM     Post subject:  

There's another kicker... furrydom couldn't survive in the average comic community. Not only would it be such a niche market as to have no way of stacking up against comics in general, but most "professional" furry artists couldn't keep up with the work pace of the comic/fantasy art world in general. That'd be kind of like a little league T-ball player trying to cut it at the World Series.

I agree the furry community seems to protect artist starting out but when their skills devlop it limmits them and makes it hard for them to jump over to the larger comic community thus they get stuck in the furry community.


Im not going to argue that furry doesn't have a track record in this department or that things are going to change. But everything you guys are saying here is really personal issues with individual artists and fans. All comics are a niche market. I like comics as much as the next guy.. but the fact is the serial 'comic book' is dying out. They are for geeks. The only people who still buy the Marvel/DC superhero shit is die hard collectors, investors and people who just collect comics out of habit since they never gave it up in the first place. The only real future is see is one shot GN's and collected volumes. Possibly switching to a magazine sized format (like Heavy Metal is)

Anyway, to say "furry" comics cant survive in a general comics market - depends on what you mean. The furry-fandom only type of comics? Shit so bizarre and fetishized only a furry could read it? Genus is probably the best selling furry comic out there right now and from what I gather about 50% of its readership is non-furry.

Anybody can write shit, and anybody could write something good. I really refuse to look at it any other way. You could have an artist who is involved in furry fandom, who is obsessed with the use of anthropomorphics - doesn't mean they couldn't write a good story and draw a good comic to go along with it. They probably won't.. but thats really not the point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lazarian
Qualificator
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 21

Posted: 12/2/2004 3:17:11 AM     Post subject:  

What I don't understand is how something like this could be remotely profitable. Even though there may be a small following of fans of his comic strip, what percentage of them would bother to pay twelve dollars a month to see his chars on an x-rated site, even with guest artists? After the costs of hosting and the effort of maintaining and updating it, it hardly seems that there would be enough revenue generated to buy a couple of pizzas and a case of beer. And chances are that the second some Sibe/FXC/whateverthefuck gets a subscription, even more of the potential profit will be shot to hell since the subscriber base would already be miniscule.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DA
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 595

Posted: 12/2/2004 4:40:27 AM     Post subject:  

Indeed. There are many talented furry artists out there that could not draw a human to save their life. What they don't realize is to be successful in comics and illustration, you have to be able to draw anything on demand... even if you've never drawn it before.


Indeed this is a biggest problem of any artist who does anthro's because the fans will kiss anyone's ass who can draw better than a 2 year old (and even the ass of those who can't sometimes) just to get more art the temptation to remain stuck in a rut just drawing the same thing is very strong. A lot of these people seem to forget humans are animals too and if you can draw a human you can draw pretty much anything.

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Prattler
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 104

Posted: 12/2/2004 8:52:28 AM     Post subject:  

What I don't understand is how something like this could be remotely profitable. Even though there may be a small following of fans of his comic strip, what percentage of them would bother to pay twelve dollars a month to see his chars on an x-rated site, even with guest artists? After the costs of hosting and the effort of maintaining and updating it, it hardly seems that there would be enough revenue generated to buy a couple of pizzas and a case of beer. And chances are that the second some Sibe/FXC/whateverthefuck gets a subscription, even more of the potential profit will be shot to hell since the subscriber base would already be miniscule.

God knows. Bernal claims to make $75K a year off sexyfur.com, but he has signifigantly more "talent" than EWS in that the characters he draws have some semblance of appeal outside of furry, he can draw some non-furries who just have a "fur fetish" and are unaware of the fandom in.

EWS has no appeal outside furry at all. In addition, Bernal uses rather formulaic posing and layout for his pieces which fits in with the norms found on softcore porn sites. EWS's stuff is "comical" in nature. Frankly, it's not jerkable to most consumers.

I really don't know what EWS is thinking but I guess it's not like his site is going to consume an awful lot of bandwidth if noone signs up, so he has little to lose. He'll probably get some hardcore fans of his and some people from fandom to sign up, so he might turn a small profit, but probably not enough to live off of unless he really starts cranking out some exciting material or pornographic animations to draw people to the site.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 12/2/2004 9:01:48 AM     Post subject:  

God knows. Bernal claims to make $75K a year off sexyfur.com, but he has signifigantly more "talent" than EWS in that the characters he draws have some semblance of appeal outside of furry, he can draw some non-furries who just have a "fur fetish" and are unaware of the fandom in.


Theres also a huge benefit in just being the first to do something.
Bernal was the first for a pay-furry-porn site right ?


I looked at the prices on Schwartz' site, and they seem out of whack

A year membership with a site like Suicide Girls (for ex, the only one I know :) ) is the same price as Schwartz' 3 month membership ...and SG is a hell of a lot more popular, has more content, and they put on live shows in cities around the country (even where I live)

I just don't think Eric has the business sense to succeed at this little venture of his.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Prattler
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 104

Posted: 12/2/2004 9:08:25 AM     Post subject:  

God knows. Bernal claims to make $75K a year off sexyfur.com, but he has signifigantly more "talent" than EWS in that the characters he draws have some semblance of appeal outside of furry, he can draw some non-furries who just have a "fur fetish" and are unaware of the fandom in.


Theres also a huge benefit in just being the first to do something.
Bernal was the first for a pay-furry-porn site right ?


I looked at the prices on Schwartz' site, and they seem out of whack

A year membership with a site like Suicide Girls (for ex, the only one I know :) ) is the same price as Schwartz' 3 month membership ...and SG is a hell of a lot more popular, has more content, and they put on live shows in cities around the country (even where I live)

I just don't think Eric has the business sense to succeed at this little venture of his.


As far as I know Bernal was first, yes.

EWS's prices probably won't deter fans of his or people from furry fandom - there's really little else out there to pick from as far as "high quality porn" goes. But unless he gets more material, most of them won't bother renewing their subscriptions once they've seen everything available. That's the other problem EWS has - he's slow and doesn't produce enough new work to keep anyone interested.

I've toyed with the idea of taking my yiff.com domain and creating an adult version of Yerf out of it, but the bandwidth cost would be obscene and there's no way to make it pay for itself without charging or being lucky enough to work for a company which "doesn't notice" the terrabytes of bandwidth being sucked down, which artists would have a cow over unless you gave them a cut, thusly killing any profit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
creature
Venter
Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 240

Posted: 12/2/2004 10:54:26 AM     Post subject:  

Remember what I said to you on channel. Cogent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 551

Posted: 12/2/2004 1:34:32 PM     Post subject:  

Indeed. There are many talented furry artists out there that could not draw a human to save their life. What they don't realize is to be successful in comics and illustration, you have to be able to draw anything on demand... even if you've never drawn it before.

Being able to draw anything is definitely an asset for an artist, but depending on what you're selling, it's not necessarily something you must be able to do. Some succesful comics artists, e.g. Matt Groening, have very "narrow" art skills, but they're good at that one thing they do, and for them it's sufficient.

A year membership with a site like Suicide Girls (for ex, the only one I know :) ) is the same price as Schwartz' 3 month membership ...and SG is a hell of a lot more popular, has more content, and they put on live shows in cities around the country (even where I live)

As I understand it, Suicide Girls is for people who aren't interested in normal pay porn, but want something alternative with a little class plus nice bonuses like interviews with artists and musicians, reviews etc. So they'll pay a little extra, compared to a "normal" porn site, for that better content.

The thing is, the more "niche" a product is, the fewer people are interested, but those fewer people will be willing to cough up more money each. This is the factor that works in favour of Schwartz - his porn art appeals only to a very small group, but since this group consists mainly of hardcore furry fetishists, they won't mind paying his exorbiant prices, because they get a very special product.

But I do think bobby is right in that Schwartz is simply producing too little work for this site of his to become a success.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/2/2004 4:20:58 PM     Post subject:  

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P

That is and always has been one of furrydom's biggest downfalls. You will see artists asking for comments on their work, but then they fly to pieces when you say anything less than positive about their work. They will quickly say they were looking for constructive criticism, when, really, they're just wanting accolades.

If you say something like "You have a good sense of anatomy, but the pose is a little static." you will have scores of angry furries descending upon you like chimpanzee paratroopers because you dared to suggest that something about the picture wasn't absolutely perfect. They're not looking for constructive comments, they're just wanting comments like "OMG, HAWT!" or "Nice pic " or "Great stuff! *download*." Of course, since they can't take even constructive criticism, they never listen to the comments, and, hence, slow down their learning curve greatly. One of the best bits of advice I ever received was from Wayne VanSant, who drew "The Nam" for Marvel. He liked my work, but suggested I neaten it up a bit.. showing more stuff in my portfolio that was inked and cleaned up, rather than a lot of sketches. He suggested even sketches should show some level of refinement... which is one of the reason I love the "blue pencil" sketches. It lets you pull out the lines you want, and has that animationish production sketch look.... rough, but refined. Granted, it wasn't a proffesional portfolio... and I could have easily defended it as such. But, I took everything he said to heart for future improvements.

Paul, regarding Groening... yeah.. lots of artists have their niche without needing to really broaden the scope of their skill. Many of them have a gimmick that works for a while. Many newspaper comic strip artists have a limited scope of ability. But, with someone like Groening, the real thing he's selling is his ideas. In his "Life is Hell" comics, the art just supported the humor, rather than vice versa. With The Simpsons and Futurama, Groening is the mastermind behind it, but the art draws on the work of many people. So, Groening really hit his success with his ideas, rather than his artistic talent.

Likewise, Bill Watterson didn't have to be a gifted artist to really sell Calvin and Hobbes. The whimsy and humor in that would have worked well with many art styles. But, his artistic ability really put him over the top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 551

Posted: 12/3/2004 3:14:28 PM     Post subject:  

Paul, regarding Groening... yeah.. lots of artists have their niche without needing to really broaden the scope of their skill. Many of them have a gimmick that works for a while. Many newspaper comic strip artists have a limited scope of ability. But, with someone like Groening, the real thing he's selling is his ideas. In his "Life is Hell" comics, the art just supported the humor, rather than vice versa. With The Simpsons and Futurama, Groening is the mastermind behind it, but the art draws on the work of many people. So, Groening really hit his success with his ideas, rather than his artistic talent.

Well, that was my point, really. It's true that most furry artists could never have a career in illustration outside furry circles, because they don't have the necessary drawing skill. But a few have some ideas that their limited skill bring over well, and if they were a little more focused, they could market those ideas beyond furrydumb.

Eric Schwartz is a case in point, here: Sabrina Online has some nice ideas; his art looks good even though it's obvious there are lots of things he can't or won't be arsed to draw - so if he dropped the porn innuendo that's been a staple of the strip since the introduction of ZigZag, and he actually got off his arse and produced one strip per day instead of three or four strips per month, hell, he would have something that could very well be sold as a real newspaper strip.

But of course, he probably wants to do all the porn innuendo, so meh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/3/2004 3:42:52 PM     Post subject:  

I don't know about a newspaper strip. Like you said, the porn stuff is a big factor in that... but also all of the drippy sentimentalism about Amy the Squirrel's life that nobody but Amy fans from the early Amiga days gives a rat's ass about. There's not enough in the strip to really speak to the masses.

It could, however, probably make it in a magazine dedicated to Amiga users, or even in some of the gaming magazines, since Sabrina is a gaming/computer/SF/toy geek's wet dream. There are also strong elements of 'net culture in there, which might give it appeal to readers of magazines dedicated to said culture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DA
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 595

Posted: 12/3/2004 4:58:23 PM     Post subject:  

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P

That is and always has been one of furrydom's biggest downfalls. You will see artists asking for comments on their work, but then they fly to pieces when you say anything less than positive about their work. They will quickly say they were looking for constructive criticism, when, really, they're just wanting accolades.

If you say something like "You have a good sense of anatomy, but the pose is a little static." you will have scores of angry furries descending upon you like chimpanzee paratroopers because you dared to suggest that something about the picture wasn't absolutely perfect. They're not looking for constructive comments, they're just wanting comments like "OMG, HAWT!" or "Nice pic " or "Great stuff! *download*." Of course, since they can't take even constructive criticism, they never listen to the comments, and, hence, slow down their learning curve greatly.


Yeah but it also doesn't help the amount of fantards you get out there who attack on mass if you dare to suggest that foxy wolfbutt could improve or do something better, or hell that it might make a nice change to see him draw something other than one rehashed thing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 12/3/2004 5:09:42 PM     Post subject:  

I don't know about a newspaper strip. Like you said, the porn stuff is a big factor in that

Yhea it is getting worse in that respect, in the recent strips Sabrina sent her boyfreind softcore porn. Then the latest strips it looks like Sabrina invited both her boyfreind and her father of a vist to Zig's studio.

It could, however, probably make it in a magazine dedicated to Amiga users

There is a Amiga Mag? Thought they all died out as the Amiga community is pretty messed up with delusions of rebirth (At least Atari STers, C64es,ect know they're retro).

Wrong Planet A gag news sites that pokes fun at the Amiga community even did a quick jab at EWS in the gag open office news report.

"Eric Schwarz of Sabrina online fame also contributed to the exciting new project, with his OpenCrotch AmigaOffice Bunny. "A sexy mascot for a sexy project is all what's really needed,", he said. To keep with the office theme, Bunny will be wearing a short secretary skirt, no panties, and will be striking a variety of suggestive poses to help launch the new port. "


, or even in some of the gaming magazines, since Sabrina is a gaming/computer/SF/toy geek's wet dream. There are also strong elements of 'net culture in there, which might give it appeal to readers of magazines dedicated to said culture.


Yhea if EWS retooled it a bit Sabrina could run in a number of geek related mags.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mitch
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 473

Posted: 12/3/2004 5:26:13 PM     Post subject:  

I don't know about a newspaper strip. Like you said, the porn stuff is a big factor in that... but also all of the drippy sentimentalism about Amy the Squirrel's life that nobody but Amy fans from the early Amiga days gives a rat's ass about. There's not enough in the strip to really speak to the masses.

It could, however, probably make it in a magazine dedicated to Amiga users, or even in some of the gaming magazines, since Sabrina is a gaming/computer/SF/toy geek's wet dream. There are also strong elements of 'net culture in there, which might give it appeal to readers of magazines dedicated to said culture.


Yhea if EWS retooled it a bit Sabrina could run in a number of geek related mags.

It ran for a while in Amiga Format: looky here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/3/2004 5:56:10 PM     Post subject:  

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P

That is and always has been one of furrydom's biggest downfalls. You will see artists asking for comments on their work, but then they fly to pieces when you say anything less than positive about their work. They will quickly say they were looking for constructive criticism, when, really, they're just wanting accolades.


I've known non-furry artists like that. One that comes to mind is a lady who exclusively draws countless pictures of Mega Man X as a vampire. Let's just say her anatomy and poses need work. Anyway, she gets infuriated when you question why ALL she draws is Mega Man X sucking ze blood, and his literally interenet-yelled at people not to giver her ANY negative criticism.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/3/2004 7:00:51 PM     Post subject:  

All of the talk got me curious, so I peeked back at Sabrina Online. Looking at the stories and such, for one, I'm surprised Sabrina doesn't slap ZigZag with a sexual harassment suit. It may be my imagination, too.. but I think Schwartz has actually gotten worse. Not to say his style has deteriorated.. although it's definitely stagnated since about, oh, 1989. But, as the strips progress, they actually look more and more sloppy. Maybe he's just rushed or something.. and Schwartz's work has always had a certain sloppiness to it.. but the linework in the recent strips is just pathetic. There's a difference between style and turning out a cheap product.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/3/2004 10:25:38 PM     Post subject:  

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P

That is and always has been one of furrydom's biggest downfalls. You will see artists asking for comments on their work, but then they fly to pieces when you say anything less than positive about their work. They will quickly say they were looking for constructive criticism, when, really, they're just wanting accolades.


I've known non-furry artists like that. One that comes to mind is a lady who exclusively draws countless pictures of Mega Man X as a vampire. Let's just say her anatomy and poses need work. Anyway, she gets infuriated when you question why ALL she draws is Mega Man X sucking ze blood, and his literally interenet-yelled at people not to giver her ANY negative criticism.


Maybe I'm just tired, but the mental concept of what you just typed sounds extremely funny, especially if you read it out loud.

I mean, the combination alone Mega Man + Vampire cracks me up. Especially if it's drawn like the old Mega Man sprite character.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/3/2004 10:29:04 PM     Post subject:  

All of the talk got me curious, so I peeked back at Sabrina Online. Looking at the stories and such, for one, I'm surprised Sabrina doesn't slap ZigZag with a sexual harassment suit. It may be my imagination, too.. but I think Schwartz has actually gotten worse. Not to say his style has deteriorated.. although it's definitely stagnated since about, oh, 1989. But, as the strips progress, they actually look more and more sloppy. Maybe he's just rushed or something.. and Schwartz's work has always had a certain sloppiness to it.. but the linework in the recent strips is just pathetic. There's a difference between style and turning out a cheap product.


He's been having a pretty bad stretch of fortune in the RL department so I'm sure his focus on art isn't quite where it used to be, which is also reflected in his overall reduction of art.

The bad thing about webcomics is, once you start them, you're almost obligated to continue them, whether you really want to or feel like it or not. That is if you particularly care about your web comic and its readership.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/3/2004 10:39:27 PM     Post subject:  


...
The bad thing about webcomics is, once you start them, you're almost obligated to continue them, whether you really want to or feel like it or not. That is if you particularly care about your web comic and its readership.


I don't. ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Prattler
Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 104

Posted: 12/3/2004 10:43:24 PM     Post subject:  

All of the talk got me curious, so I peeked back at Sabrina Online. Looking at the stories and such, for one, I'm surprised Sabrina doesn't slap ZigZag with a sexual harassment suit. It may be my imagination, too.. but I think Schwartz has actually gotten worse. Not to say his style has deteriorated.. although it's definitely stagnated since about, oh, 1989. But, as the strips progress, they actually look more and more sloppy. Maybe he's just rushed or something.. and Schwartz's work has always had a certain sloppiness to it.. but the linework in the recent strips is just pathetic. There's a difference between style and turning out a cheap product.

Sabrina is a reflection of a lot of Eric's personal fantasies and desires, and it's logical that Eric, being a real simple guy, has "exhausted" that in the strip's run so there's little left in the way of material to add.

I hate Sabrina Online for that. Reading the strip is like reading Eric's "what I wish I could have in a woman" fantasy. That and most of the characters which keep people reading the strip are characters Eric didn't even create. He's not an imaginative fellow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/4/2004 2:09:30 AM     Post subject:  

I simply can't stomach Sabrina Online. There's really very few webcomics that inane and pathetic, or folks as inane and pathetic as Schwartz. I can't read far enough into it to even criticize it beyond yelling "Oh, enough already!" at the screen before X'ing off the window with that god forsaken comic on it.

Schwartz, for the love of God get your dick out of your OWN CARTOON CHARACTER's ass and get a fucking girlfriend.

Maybe I'm just tired, but the mental concept of what you just typed sounds extremely funny, especially if you read it out loud.

I mean, the combination alone Mega Man + Vampire cracks me up. Especially if it's drawn like the old Mega Man sprite character.


Nah, it's Mega Man X, but still pretty funny, especially in the "angst ahoy" nature of it. Of all the ways one can express their depression over life, drawing bloody pictures of a vampiric Mega Man X would be the LAST thing I would see coming. It keeps conjouring images of a little Metool dressed like Van Helsing...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/4/2004 3:11:20 AM     Post subject:  


There is a Amiga Mag? Thought they all died out as the Amiga community is pretty messed up with delusions of rebirth (At least Atari STers, C64es,ect know they're retro).


You're not going to believe it, but, actually, you can still buy brand new Atari 2600-compatible systems. That's cool 'cause, you know, yours truly is a fan of 8-bit Atari systems. :)

I suspect Amiga die-hard fans must be rrrrabid about this, though.
How come they're offering a puny pre-NES console system and nobody mentions anything about reviving their precious machines? :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/4/2004 4:19:08 AM     Post subject:  

I simply can't stomach Sabrina Online. There's really very few webcomics that inane and pathetic, or folks as inane and pathetic as Schwartz. I can't read far enough into it to even criticize it beyond yelling "Oh, enough already!" at the screen before X'ing off the window with that god forsaken comic on it.

Schwartz, for the love of God get your dick out of your OWN CARTOON CHARACTER's ass and get a fucking girlfriend.

Maybe I'm just tired, but the mental concept of what you just typed sounds extremely funny, especially if you read it out loud.

I mean, the combination alone Mega Man + Vampire cracks me up. Especially if it's drawn like the old Mega Man sprite character.


Nah, it's Mega Man X, but still pretty funny, especially in the "angst ahoy" nature of it. Of all the ways one can express their depression over life, drawing bloody pictures of a vampiric Mega Man X would be the LAST thing I would see coming. It keeps conjouring images of a little Metool dressed like Van Helsing...


Well, I think comments directed towards a comic strip are far and warranted. Like you said in a previous one, if you don't like it, why are you still reading it (it's like picking at a scab that's trying to heal).

But personal attacks towards a person you really don't know save for a comic strip or artwork is a bit much no? I mean, a lot can be said about many folks who post here, which I'm sure does not reflect the type of person they are in real life (at least I certainly hope that's the case).

And the MegaMan X thing still sounds funny. It's like a secret power up mode.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DA
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 595

Posted: 12/4/2004 8:13:03 AM     Post subject:  

Still others go off at the mere idea that someone criticised art, like omg art and artests are inviolate and heaven forbid anyone say anything less than glowingly complimentary about them.

I just recently got told I'm an asshole because I have standards :lol: and they wonder why their idols never get famous. :P

That is and always has been one of furrydom's biggest downfalls. You will see artists asking for comments on their work, but then they fly to pieces when you say anything less than positive about their work. They will quickly say they were looking for constructive criticism, when, really, they're just wanting accolades.


I've known non-furry artists like that. One that comes to mind is a lady who exclusively draws countless pictures of Mega Man X as a vampire. Let's just say her anatomy and poses need work. Anyway, she gets infuriated when you question why ALL she draws is Mega Man X sucking ze blood, and his literally interenet-yelled at people not to giver her ANY negative criticism.


Ah, unfortunately the anime fandom also breeds the same sort of morons as the furry fandom a lot of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/4/2004 4:55:33 PM     Post subject:  

Not as often, though, and it can be a different kind of monster, so to speak. One with the patheticness shared with the furries, but without the whole "fetishes gone too far" part.

I simply can't stomach Sabrina Online. There's really very few webcomics that inane and pathetic, or folks as inane and pathetic as Schwartz. I can't read far enough into it to even criticize it beyond yelling "Oh, enough already!" at the screen before X'ing off the window with that god forsaken comic on it.

Schwartz, for the love of God get your dick out of your OWN CARTOON CHARACTER's ass and get a fucking girlfriend.

Maybe I'm just tired, but the mental concept of what you just typed sounds extremely funny, especially if you read it out loud.

I mean, the combination alone Mega Man + Vampire cracks me up. Especially if it's drawn like the old Mega Man sprite character.


Nah, it's Mega Man X, but still pretty funny, especially in the "angst ahoy" nature of it. Of all the ways one can express their depression over life, drawing bloody pictures of a vampiric Mega Man X would be the LAST thing I would see coming. It keeps conjouring images of a little Metool dressed like Van Helsing...


Well, I think comments directed towards a comic strip are far and warranted. Like you said in a previous one, if you don't like it, why are you still reading it (it's like picking at a scab that's trying to heal).

But personal attacks towards a person you really don't know save for a comic strip or artwork is a bit much no? I mean, a lot can be said about many folks who post here, which I'm sure does not reflect the type of person they are in real life (at least I certainly hope that's the case).


I'm NOT reading it. I tried reading it once, and it wasted time out of my life I know I'm gonna regret wasting when I'm dying.

No, no, no, I don't attack Schwartz for his strip, I attack him....

Because of his TDK shinanegans

Because of his behavior

Because of his hypocritical attitude

Because of his pathetic obssesion with Blackrabbit's character and his own.

Because of his actions

Do I really need to go on?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/4/2004 7:57:58 PM     Post subject:  

Please do... that's all just one reason... =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/5/2004 9:37:54 PM     Post subject:  

Oh har har har.

I guess they could all fall under behavior and actions, but you know what I mean. The man is a mentally underdeveloped dickhead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rankin
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 1514

Posted: 12/5/2004 10:04:02 PM     Post subject:  

The man is a mentally underdeveloped dickhead.


WELCOME TO THE FANDOM!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 551

Posted: 12/6/2004 1:33:50 AM     Post subject:  

I don't know about a newspaper strip. Like you said, the porn stuff is a big factor in that... but also all of the drippy sentimentalism about Amy the Squirrel's life that nobody but Amy fans from the early Amiga days gives a rat's ass about. There's not enough in the strip to really speak to the masses.

It could, however, probably make it in a magazine dedicated to Amiga users, or even in some of the gaming magazines, since Sabrina is a gaming/computer/SF/toy geek's wet dream. There are also strong elements of 'net culture in there, which might give it appeal to readers of magazines dedicated to said culture.

I hate Sabrina Online for that. Reading the strip is like reading Eric's "what I wish I could have in a woman" fantasy. That and most of the characters which keep people reading the strip are characters Eric didn't even create. He's not an imaginative fellow.

I went and re-read a lot of the Sabrina Online strips (been a long time since I did read it), and you're both right, there's just not enough meat on it to have a broad appeal. Somehow, I remembered it as better than it is. What gives it some appeal is that some of the characters are quite charming, and the art is pretty neat, but Schwartz just doesn't do much with the characters, and he never develops his art beyond a certain visual formula he seems stuck at or content with. So yeah, it seems Schwartz simply doesn't have the ideas to ever go further. Now if he got a scriptwriter... but that means we're back to the "professionals don't work with people who overtly violate copyright law" thing. Oh well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/9/2004 5:22:32 AM     Post subject:  

Oh har har har.

I guess they could all fall under behavior and actions, but you know what I mean. The man is a mentally underdeveloped dickhead.


Why, what has he done to you to be a dickhead?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/10/2004 1:09:14 AM     Post subject:  

Happend to find this quote... it fits our lil group perfectly! =)

Statler:We'd love to see your act!

Waldorf: We'd hate to miss your act!

Statler: In fact, we'd love to hate your act!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/10/2004 6:47:37 PM     Post subject:  

Oh har har har.

I guess they could all fall under behavior and actions, but you know what I mean. The man is a mentally underdeveloped dickhead.


Why, what has he done to you to be a dickhead?


You don't need someone to do something to you to see what they're like. Do you need Jeffrey Dahmer to wear your flesh on a coat for you to see he's a psycho? No. Does Christina Agu-whatever have to fuck you before you see that she's a total slut? No. You just see it plain as day. Same with Schwartz. From the way he behaves, you can tell he's a hypocritical dick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLaitila
Vociferator
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 408

Posted: 12/10/2004 8:09:57 PM     Post subject:  

Why, what has he done to you to be a dickhead?


What has Idi Amin done to you?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/11/2004 2:25:09 AM     Post subject:  

You don't need someone to do something to you to see what they're like. Do you need Jeffrey Dahmer to wear your flesh on a coat for you to see he's a psycho? No. Does Christina Agu-whatever have to fuck you before you see that she's a total slut? No. You just see it plain as day. Same with Schwartz. From the way he behaves, you can tell he's a hypocritical dick.


So far the stories of him being a I've read of him being a dickhead consists of him:

1. Being ashamed enough of some copyright infringing porn he drew years ago that he doesn't want to fess up to it

2. Wanting to keep Sabrina porn from being all over the net, essentially diluting the uniqueness of his only current means of employment

3. Being a bit of a slob

and

4. Not really paying a great deal of interest to strangers coming up to him and saying things unless they seem interested in buying his stuff.


Clearly the man is not merely "less than perfect", but a monster that eats baptist babies by the truckload.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/11/2004 2:40:09 AM     Post subject:  

You don't need someone to do something to you to see what they're like. Do you need Jeffrey Dahmer to wear your flesh on a coat for you to see he's a psycho? No. Does Christina Agu-whatever have to fuck you before you see that she's a total slut? No. You just see it plain as day. Same with Schwartz. From the way he behaves, you can tell he's a hypocritical dick.


So far the stories of him being a I've read of him being a dickhead consists of him:

1. Being ashamed enough of some copyright infringing porn he drew years ago that he doesn't want to fess up to it

2. Wanting to keep Sabrina porn from being all over the net, essentially diluting the uniqueness of his only current means of employment

3. Being a bit of a slob

and

4. Not really paying a great deal of interest to strangers coming up to him and saying things unless they seem interested in buying his stuff.


Clearly the man is not merely "less than perfect", but a monster that eats baptist babies by the truckload.


Nice try...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/11/2004 2:47:15 AM     Post subject:  


Nice try...


Yeah, I read those before I posted. Still not seeing what makes the man a dick. Ashamed of something he did and unwilling to fess up? Sure. Willing to enforce a double standard in order to pay his bills? Sure. But come on, I'm sure we've all seen/met way worse. I know I have.

For the reconrd I met him, once. He seemed nice enough. And he said hello to me, even though I didn't ask to buy anything from him (and didn't buy anything from him in the end).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shmeckopolis
Vociferator
Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Posts: 314

Posted: 12/11/2004 3:00:56 AM     Post subject:  

Wow! He said hello?! My God the man is a SAINT!

Yeah, hypocrisy, lying, and enforcing a double standard don't make the man a dick. He can do what he wants with anyone else's characters, yet in his little mind, that doesn't go both ways. Nah, but he's still a helluva guy, right?

And the fact that he's fucking AWFUL at this "double identity" thing doesn't shine a favorable light on his intelligence.

He has no tact. Simple as that. Hell, he is the Anti-Tact.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/11/2004 3:16:07 AM     Post subject:  

Wow! He said hello?! My God the man is a SAINT!
Well hell, one of the reasons I saw on the CYD forums was that he apparently didn't care to say anything to people unless he thought they'd buy something.

Yeah, hypocrisy, lying, and enforcing a double standard don't make the man a dick. He can do what he wants with anyone else's characters, yet in his little mind, that doesn't go both ways. Nah, but he's still a helluva guy, right?


Never said he was a helluva guy, okay? But lets be real here. If he hadn't been firm on the no Sabrina porn rule, knowing the furry community, there'd be Sabrina porn everywhere, and he'd be hard pressed to: A. keep people interested in a character they see everywhere, and B. maintain what he clearly thinks is an important aspect of her character, i.e. that she's (relatively speaking) not a very sexual individual.

Forget for just a minute the ethics of drawing Disney or whatever other characters doing the horizontal mambo. Purely from a "I have to keep food on my table" standpoint any amount of Dizney pr0n isn't hurting Eisner's pocketbook one bit. Hell, might be helping the money-grubbing bastard. Keeping a very small and finicky fandom interested in his (relatively) unknown character directly affects Eric's income. So would fessing up to having done naughty things to copyrighted characters. No, it weren't a good thing wot he did, but I don't blame him much for being damned reluctant to put his income on the line by admitting he did it.


And the fact that he's fucking AWFUL at this "double identity" thing doesn't shine a favorable light on his intelligence.


Ever hear how Harlan Ellison got fired from Disney? He was making jokes at the table with his friends about a Disney porn flick, and acted out the voices of Mickey and co.

Roy Disney and some other big wigs were at a table nearby.

Sometimes smart people aren't as careful about their indescretions as perhaps they should be.

He has no tact. Simple as that. Hell, he is the Anti-Tact.
Okay, I'm not really sure what tact has to do with it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stoneth
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 545

Posted: 12/11/2004 3:19:23 AM     Post subject:  

I met him once at ConiFur NW 2002 (from whom I bought an issue of Wild Frontier). I wasn't aware of the whole TDK thingie at the time. He seemed nice enough, but one cannot judge a book by ze cover as zey say.

Has he not also gone under the alias Wakko Warner?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 12/11/2004 4:15:11 AM     Post subject:  

He's probably thought of as a dick because he's a hypocrite. Like Rankin said, this is a man who tears his hair out whenever someone draws porn of his characters, and then does a 180 and starts a porn site involving said characters. A pay porn site, mind you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/11/2004 4:38:27 AM     Post subject:  

Near as I can tell he only ever had a real problem with people drawing one particular one of his characters. The one that's essentially his flagship char. And who, I'm guessing, isn't on his new pay site.

Yeah, he has some guidelines he's given for the other characters, but the only one he's ever made a stink over was Sabrina. Why? Because if someone draws Disney erotica it's not (lets be realistic here) doing the company much harm financially. Wheras I have no problem seeing a free licence to do Sabrina porn hurting Schwartz.

It may seem like picking nits, but I really do see an important distinction here that I think should be considered before going overboard on how much of a hypocrite he is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/11/2004 6:45:29 AM     Post subject:  

Near as I can tell he only ever had a real problem with people drawing one particular one of his characters. The one that's essentially his flagship char. And who, I'm guessing, isn't on his new pay site.

Yeah, he has some guidelines he's given for the other characters, but the only one he's ever made a stink over was Sabrina. Why? Because if someone draws Disney erotica it's not (lets be realistic here) doing the company much harm financially. Wheras I have no problem seeing a free licence to do Sabrina porn hurting Schwartz.

It may seem like picking nits, but I really do see an important distinction here that I think should be considered before going overboard on how much of a hypocrite he is.


I'd say it had more to do with people drawing the adult Sabrina haivng sex with her little child sister Tabatha. I'd say that'd be enough to make anybody over protective and a bit peeved. That's sick even if they are cartoon characers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/11/2004 6:51:09 AM     Post subject:  

Oh har har har.

I guess they could all fall under behavior and actions, but you know what I mean. The man is a mentally underdeveloped dickhead.


Why, what has he done to you to be a dickhead?


You don't need someone to do something to you to see what they're like. Do you need Jeffrey Dahmer to wear your flesh on a coat for you to see he's a psycho? No. Does Christina Agu-whatever have to fuck you before you see that she's a total slut? No. You just see it plain as day. Same with Schwartz. From the way he behaves, you can tell he's a hypocritical dick.



yeah, well I knew him personally and have grown to know him as a very quite guy, even if you have known him for a long time.

He's got a great online personality but very shy and low-key in person. His strips and art are more expressive sometimes than the person. SO yeah, I'd say sometimes you do have to know someone to see what they're like.

Granted, the site wouldn't be my choice of fund raising of sorts,but I guess thinking of why he'd suddenly do one to do so doesn't really matter much either. But, I never let people's online personality dictate to me the type of perosn they are in RL, other wise I'd assume you and some others are prejudging also hypocritical A=holes, but I highly doubt that's the case (for all).

(yawn, should write at 1:48am)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/11/2004 6:54:06 AM     Post subject:  

Wow! He said hello?! My God the man is a SAINT!

Yeah, hypocrisy, lying, and enforcing a double standard don't make the man a dick. He can do what he wants with anyone else's characters, yet in his little mind, that doesn't go both ways. Nah, but he's still a helluva guy, right?

And the fact that he's fucking AWFUL at this "double identity" thing doesn't shine a favorable light on his intelligence.

He has no tact. Simple as that. Hell, he is the Anti-Tact.



Just sounds to me like you got a case of pitbull mentality really.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/11/2004 7:00:50 AM     Post subject:  

Yeah, hypocrisy, lying, and enforcing a double standard don't make the man a dick. He can do what he wants with anyone else's characters, yet in his little mind, that doesn't go both ways. Nah, but he's still a helluva guy, right?


Never said he was a helluva guy, okay? But lets be real here. If he hadn't been firm on the no Sabrina porn rule, knowing the furry community, there'd be Sabrina porn everywhere, and he'd be hard pressed to: A. keep people interested in a character they see everywhere, and B. maintain what he clearly thinks is an important aspect of her character, i.e. that she's (relatively speaking) not a very sexual individual.
..


I.E. The Zig Zag affect. He's my best friend, but the worst thing that could have happened was letting just about anybody draw or write about Zig Zag. Now she's out of control. And for better or for worst, if Eric hadn't set up some kind of guidelines, we'd be going through the Sabrina and Tabatha affect (since that was the kind of porn that originally was out when he started the no Sabrina porn, and I'm sure nobody wants that.)

Frankly, I can think of a more practical reason for nobody doing Sabrina porn. Eric's art style. I've tried drawing her,and his style makes her damn hard to draw looking the way he draws her. And I remember seeing the Sabrina porn, and it was golfull. The net today would be flooded with very poorly drawn imitations of naked Sabrina's running around the place doing Lord knows what. Instead we got run-a-muck Zig Zag.

Some things are better left undone. Even in furry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/11/2004 7:57:16 AM     Post subject:  

I'd say it had more to do with people drawing the adult Sabrina haivng sex with her little child sister Tabatha. I'd say that'd be enough to make anybody over protective and a bit peeved. That's sick even if they are cartoon characers.


My understanding (and this is pure heresay, mind) was that, prior to 2001, he essentially just said "Well I can't vouch for the other creators, but please don't draw porn of Sabrina herself, and for the other characters use your best discretion." Then he came across something (supposedly with Tabitha) that made him regret assuming furdom HAD a "best" discretion and sat down to write out the F.A.Q..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Baird
Prattler
Joined: 04 Aug 2003
Posts: 133

Posted: 12/11/2004 8:28:42 AM     Post subject:  

My understanding (and this is pure heresay, mind) was that, prior to 2001, he essentially just said "Well I can't vouch for the other creators, but please don't draw porn of Sabrina herself, and for the other characters use your best discretion." Then he came across something (supposedly with Tabitha) that made him regret assuming furdom HAD a "best" discretion and sat down to write out the F.A.Q..

How do I put this..? "You're not very well versed with the true situtaton, so please stfu until you know more" ... After the (deserved) success he received for the Aerotoon, Amy, and Flip cartoons, EWS when almost straight into drawing hardcore furry porn. He's not some poor innocent Artist who was fucked-over by spoogefans ART RAPEing his characters-- 'TDK' was drawing totally mysoginistic smut (Gadget + Wood Screws...) and was a Darling of the Furry Spooge Scene, second only to Doug Winger (because DW published more in public, whereas EWS' stuff had to be bought through conventions or warezed). The since-deleted TDK Yahoo group was the major 'Agenda Setter' for cartoon-studio-character porn.
Read the articles section of CYD now. huh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rankin
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 1514

Posted: 12/11/2004 8:37:37 AM     Post subject:  

To quote "Michael Nabotnie" (As played by Hal Sparks) "Who are you callin' a faggot!?!!?"

... he was better in Talk Soup.

No, I have nothing to add, but I meant it earlier, I am going to see Journey in a few hours, WOOOOOO! *barfff*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/12/2004 12:11:45 AM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/12/2004 1:21:12 AM     Post subject:  



How do I put this..? "You're not very well versed with the true situtaton, so please stfu until you know more"


Anyone with a dissenting opinion obviously doesn't know anything, right? Nice Jay Naylor impersonation.

... After the (deserved) success he received for the Aerotoon, Amy, and Flip cartoons, EWS when almost straight into drawing hardcore furry porn. He's not some poor innocent Artist who was fucked-over by spoogefans ART RAPEing his characters


I never said he was.

-- 'TDK' was drawing totally mysoginistic smut (Gadget + Wood Screws...) and was a Darling of the Furry Spooge Scene, second only to Doug Winger (because DW published more in public, whereas EWS' stuff had to be bought through conventions or warezed).


I try to take a "no harm no foul" approach to things like this. Are Warner Bros or Disney really being financially hurt by any "toon smut"? Probably not (okay, maybe someone decided never to buy a Tiny Toons DVD because they were scarred for life...). But I can (and I know I've already said this) easily see Eric having even more trouble putting bread on his table if everyone in the fandom is so sick of seeing Sabrina that they don't want to visit his site - which is precisely what I think would happen if he just waved his hand and said anything goes.

Hypocritical? Yeah. Oh, I do see shades of distinction, due to the popularity of the characters involved, as well as the finiancial aspects of the matter, but it's still hypocritical. But I don't see in Schwartz any intent to do anyone else harm (unless he set out to "Soul Raep" Walt D from beyond the grave). Yeah, he's looking after his own interests. He's human. It happens. There are waaaaaay worse things in this fandom than being hypocritical in an attempt to keep money in your wallet. There are no shortage of folks that will that will intentionally try to hurt you or walk off with your money.

Read the articles section of CYD now. huh?


... Yeah, I read those before I posted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:01:23 AM     Post subject:  

My understanding (and this is pure heresay, mind) was that, prior to 2001, he essentially just said "Well I can't vouch for the other creators, but please don't draw porn of Sabrina herself, and for the other characters use your best discretion." Then he came across something (supposedly with Tabitha) that made him regret assuming furdom HAD a "best" discretion and sat down to write out the F.A.Q..

How do I put this..? "You're not very well versed with the true situtaton, so please stfu until you know more" ... After the (deserved) success he received for the Aerotoon, Amy, and Flip cartoons, EWS when almost straight into drawing hardcore furry porn. He's not some poor innocent Artist who was fucked-over by spoogefans ART RAPEing his characters-- 'TDK' was drawing totally mysoginistic smut (Gadget + Wood Screws...) and was a Darling of the Furry Spooge Scene, second only to Doug Winger (because DW published more in public, whereas EWS' stuff had to be bought through conventions or warezed). The since-deleted TDK Yahoo group was the major 'Agenda Setter' for cartoon-studio-character porn.
Read the articles section of CYD now. huh?


Ha, and you guys wonder why nobody would take what you'd say seriously when, after someone posts a rather non -threatening opinion, you reply with a STFU response.

Very nice. Now, just what part of that post was your intent of getting that guy to come to seeing things your way exactly, with your great debating and persuasion skills?

And can I maybe just point out one thing. For someone that seems greatly offended by what he's claimed to have drawn, you sure do know alot about what he has drawn, if you know what I'm saying. Oh, that's right, you happened upon this adult stuff and all this info by chance, not actually looking for it. (wow, so, just how much of it do you have saved on your HARDdrive?)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:02:46 AM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:07:37 AM     Post subject:  

Realeaseth the STFU Aye-aye!

Technically NWS!
http://vcl.ctrl-c.liu.se/vcl/Artists/Michele-Gault/Pets/aye-aye.jpg

And poor raped Fifi issa child too... =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:12:11 AM     Post subject:  

If you ask me for my opinion about Eric Schwartz, I would say he's the paradigm of furry fandom's history.

Eric Schwartz is a talented artist who could have had -at least- a decent career as an animator. His career started in 1989, and he enjoyed an increasing popularity after a few years. Actually, he's the -first- artist you are going to see when you open the -first- issue of The American Journal of Anthropomorphics from 1993, a professional-level book created with the purpose of showcasing the most promising artists from the furry fandom, back when it was just a promising nest of artists willing to push the concept of anthropomorphics further.

Eric was asked to have a key job on "Earth Force", an animation project by Vision Entertainment. Among other things, he was in charge of character design, a key role on any animation job.

Eric's personal situation couldn't be more promising. He was a popular artist and it seemed he was on the way of a bright career, plenty with satisfactions and recognition.

Unfortunately, it wasn't. The Earth Force project never got the green light, and Eric's style got stagnated and stuck, probably feeling no incentives to develop his style further, and preferring to live up to his popularity on the furry fandom instead of concentrating on the animation world. He probably had faith on the fandom and hoped that it would eventually grow enough to appeal a bigger audience, thus allowing artists like him to survive... But the truth is that the fandom started to transform him.

I'm sure that a lot of graphic artists, regardless of their belonging or not to furry fandom, draw erotica from time to time. We human beings are complex, and so is our sexuality, and since artists have the ability to shape those sexual fantasies, regardless or how kinky or weird they are, why not giving it a try or two?

However, common sense dictates that, in general, those drawings are to be kept private and well hidden from anybody's sight, and in particular, those people that could hire you. However, by reasons I've tried to explain before, sexuality is pretty blatant in the furry fandom, and spooge is extremely easy to find, especially on furry conventions, where you interact with warped people..., the kinkier the stuff you draw, the better. And, if you're weak, it's very easy to lose control... to draw a spoogey pic some day, to show it to some of your fans... to see your fans enjoy it... to draw some more, to create an alternate personality to do it... and again and again... until you realize that your chances to have a job on the animation world are gone for good.

That the chances to get the recognition proportional to your own talent are gone for good.

That your chances to earn a decent wage, to have a house, a wife, a life, are all gone for good.

Eric W. Schwartz could have had a life, but he traded it for 15 minutes of fame the moment he decided to show 'that naughty pic' to some friend. The porn site he just opened is the final nail on his coffin. And this saddens me to no end, because his talent deserved much, much more than a meager quarter of hour.

(Edited to streamline the text a lil' bit)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:24:38 AM     Post subject:  

If you ask me for my opinion about Eric Schwartz, I would say he's the paradigm of the of furry fandom's history.

Eric Schwartz is a talented artist who could have had -at least- a decent career. His career started in 1989, and he had an increasing popularity after a few years. Actually, he's the -first- artist you are going to see when you open the -first- issue of The American Journal of Anthropomorphics from 1993, a professional-level book created with the purpose of showcasing the most promising artists from the furry fandom, back when the it was just a promising nest of artists willing to push the concept of anthropomorphics further.

Eric was asked to have a key job on "Earth Force", an animation project by Vision Entertainment. Among other things, he was in charge of character design, a key role on any animation job.

Eric's personal situation couldn't be more promising. He was a popular artist and it seemed all of that was just the start of a bright career.

Unfortunately, it wasn't. The Earth Force project never got the green light, and Eric himself got stagnated, preferring to live up to his popularity on the furry fandom instead of concentrating on the animation world. He probably had faith on the fandom and hoped that it would eventually grow enough to appeal a bigger audience, thus allowing artists like him to survive... But the truth is that the fandom started to transform him.

I'm sure that a lot of graphic artists, regardless of their belonging furriness or lack of, draw erotica from time to time. We human beings are complex, and so is our sexuality, and since artists have the ability to shape those sexual fantasies, regardless or how kinky or weird they are, why not trying it?

However, common sense dictates that, in general, those drawings are to be kept private and well hidden from anybody's sight, and in particular, those people that could hire you. However, by reasons I've tried to explain before, sexuality is pretty blatant in the furry fandom, and spooge is extremely easy to find, especially on furry conventions, where you interact with warped people..., the kinkier the stuff you draw, the better. And, if you're weak, it's very easy to lose control... to try drawing a spoogey pic some day... to see your fans enjoy it... to draw some more, to create an alternate personality to do it... and again and again... until you realize that your chances to have a job on the animation world are gone for good.

That the chances to get the recognition proportional to your own talent are gone for good.

That your chances to earn a decent wage, to have a house, a wife, a life, are all gone for good.

Eric W. Schwartz could have had a life, but he traded it for 15 minutes of fame the moment he decided to show 'that naughty pic' to some friend. The porn site he just opened is the final nail on his coffin. And this saddens me to no end, because his talent deserved much, much more than a meager quarter of hour.


I'd say he's traded it more to take care of his sickly mother and father who get worst by the day, personally.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:28:37 AM     Post subject:  

I'd say he's traded it more to take care of his sickly mother and father who get worst by the day, personally.


Hence the... porn!?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/12/2004 3:48:21 AM     Post subject:  

I'd say he's traded it more to take care of his sickly mother and father who get worst by the day, personally.


Hence the... porn!?


Don't know about the past, more refering to the new adult site (which I didn't know about until I heard about it here).

Of course that's what I assume. But then, who can really say for sure what the motives of another human being for doing what they do is. We could speculate all day about why folks do what they do. Like why you do the type of animal art you do (toony style notewithstanding, you do excellent backgrounds, but the big eyes always kinda freaked me. But then, I've never been one for eyes half the head size).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/12/2004 4:44:02 AM     Post subject:  

Of course that's what I assume. But then, who can really say for sure what the motives of another human being for doing what they do is. We could speculate all day about why folks do what they do. Like why you do the type of animal art you do (toony style notewithstanding, you do excellent backgrounds, but the big eyes always kinda freaked me. But then, I've never been one for eyes half the head size).


I just draw my characters that way 'cause they aren't real. They are just ideograms I've been stylizing with time... Actually, I've been using the same patterns to create my characters' faces since I was 12, and, as time went by, they gradually stylized until they became into what they are nowadays. I can afford that little luxury because I'm not an artist, but a cartoonist.

If you dislike the relative size of my chars' eyes, don't worry, since I've been working to solve that. But, you know, big-eyed, stylized funny animals aren't exclusive from Japan. :)

The detailed backgrounds clashing with highly stylized characters are a tribute to Hergé, one of the founders of the European comics, and it's a constant on European comics, those I read while I grew up.

And... why funny animals? Well, I guess that's just 'cause I like'em. The same way my favorite soda is Dr. Pepper, or my favorite color is red, I just like funny animals. And I like comics, too. And I'm from Europe. It's not a surprise to find I like European comics about funny animals, and why stuff like that influenced me so much when I decided to draw cartoons.

From this perspective, it's not surprising to find I draw the way I draw.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 12/12/2004 5:44:43 AM     Post subject:  

If you ask me for my opinion about Eric Schwartz, I would say he's the paradigm of the of furry fandom's history.

Eric Schwartz is a talented artist who could have had -at least- a decent career. His career started in 1989, and he had an increasing popularity after a few years. Actually, he's the -first- artist you are going to see when you open the -first- issue of The American Journal of Anthropomorphics from 1993, a professional-level book created with the purpose of showcasing the most promising artists from the furry fandom, back when the it was just a promising nest of artists willing to push the concept of anthropomorphics further.

Eric was asked to have a key job on "Earth Force", an animation project by Vision Entertainment. Among other things, he was in charge of character design, a key role on any animation job.

Eric's personal situation couldn't be more promising. He was a popular artist and it seemed all of that was just the start of a bright career.

Unfortunately, it wasn't. The Earth Force project never got the green light, and Eric himself got stagnated, preferring to live up to his popularity on the furry fandom instead of concentrating on the animation world. He probably had faith on the fandom and hoped that it would eventually grow enough to appeal a bigger audience, thus allowing artists like him to survive... But the truth is that the fandom started to transform him.

I'm sure that a lot of graphic artists, regardless of their belonging furriness or lack of, draw erotica from time to time. We human beings are complex, and so is our sexuality, and since artists have the ability to shape those sexual fantasies, regardless or how kinky or weird they are, why not trying it?

However, common sense dictates that, in general, those drawings are to be kept private and well hidden from anybody's sight, and in particular, those people that could hire you. However, by reasons I've tried to explain before, sexuality is pretty blatant in the furry fandom, and spooge is extremely easy to find, especially on furry conventions, where you interact with warped people..., the kinkier the stuff you draw, the better. And, if you're weak, it's very easy to lose control... to try drawing a spoogey pic some day... to see your fans enjoy it... to draw some more, to create an alternate personality to do it... and again and again... until you realize that your chances to have a job on the animation world are gone for good.

That the chances to get the recognition proportional to your own talent are gone for good.

That your chances to earn a decent wage, to have a house, a wife, a life, are all gone for good.

Eric W. Schwartz could have had a life, but he traded it for 15 minutes of fame the moment he decided to show 'that naughty pic' to some friend. The porn site he just opened is the final nail on his coffin. And this saddens me to no end, because his talent deserved much, much more than a meager quarter of hour.


Boy, if only William Shakespeare were alive today...

Seriously though, I do have to agree with you. Schwartz could've made a healthy income as an animator. But he decided to draw spoogey pics of anthro characters instead. That's his decision. If he wants to flush his life down the toilet for some immature, weak-minded idiots, let him do it. It'll be a harsh lesson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blair
Rasophore
Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 57

Posted: 12/12/2004 7:04:43 AM     Post subject:  

I can't really fault Eric for this shit, i thought about it too. I mean, the only problem i have is that i really hate drawing PORN! I don't like drawing it, i won't like drawing it, and thats it.

More power to him if can make money with it. If i figured i could, i would.
But i just hate drawing porn, and creating materials for people to jack-off to makes me want to vomit blood.

I just wish that retard had quit with the TDK bullshit and just said who he was. Its none of my business really. But hey, its the internet, and therefore..not important.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Needs to get out more
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 1030

Posted: 12/12/2004 7:19:47 AM     Post subject:  

Im not in the field or anythign, so maybe Im totally wrong.. but I really fail to see how drawing porn of any kind is the end of any career.

Ive pointed out before. People who really know how to talk to people can get what they want (a job, friends, girls, whatever, anything.)


Yeah, theres going to be discretion involved on the part of an employer. Like if your REALLY well-known for really fucked up art they might not want your name on the top of a production, but its not like they couldnt use a pseudonym for you if it that was that bad (and the key being they wanted to hire you). Reed Waller ran into some stuff cuz he was known for doing Omaha and far as I heard thats basically what they did.

If Eric wanted to work in animation Im sure he could. I think the reason that he isn't is that the jobs just arn't there in quantity coupled with the fact he cannot provide what an employer wants (thats my guess).

Hey, all I want is a high paying union factory job like Ford or General Motors and apperently even thats too much to ask these days.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Computolio
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 631

Posted: 12/12/2004 9:35:54 AM     Post subject:  


I'd say he's traded it more to take care of his sickly mother and father who get worst by the day, personally.


WHAT?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/12/2004 4:20:40 PM     Post subject:  

Im not in the field or anythign, so maybe Im totally wrong.. but I really fail to see how drawing porn of any kind is the end of any career.

Ive pointed out before. People who really know how to talk to people can get what they want (a job, friends, girls, whatever, anything.)


Yeah, theres going to be discretion involved on the part of an employer. Like if your REALLY well-known for really fucked up art they might not want your name on the top of a production, but its not like they couldnt use a pseudonym for you if it that was that bad (and the key being they wanted to hire you). Reed Waller ran into some stuff cuz he was known for doing Omaha and far as I heard thats basically what they did.

If Eric wanted to work in animation Im sure he could. I think the reason that he isn't is that the jobs just arn't there in quantity coupled with the fact he cannot provide what an employer wants (thats my guess).

Hey, all I want is a high paying union factory job like Ford or General Motors and apperently even thats too much to ask these days.


It probably also should be noted, that outside of what he posts in the internet, nobody here actually knows just what it is Eric actually does do in RL.

It's possible for people to do what they want to do on the net on their own time and still continue with a normal type job (as normal as any art related job can be anyway).

People are more than what they're netsona make them out to be usually.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
D.T.
Qualificator
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 18

Posted: 12/12/2004 7:12:58 PM     Post subject:  

Eric W. Schwartz could have had a life, but he traded it for 15 minutes of fame the moment he decided to show 'that naughty pic' to some friend.


Maybe this could be a stumbling block if he was interested in going into animation. But frankly, the way the big companies are hiring, that career is a longshot no matter what.

But comics? Phil Foglio, Fred Perry and others are doing pretty darn okay for themselves in that industry. Nothing's stopping Eric from trying to go down that route.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/12/2004 9:26:35 PM     Post subject:  

Eric W. Schwartz could have had a life, but he traded it for 15 minutes of fame the moment he decided to show 'that naughty pic' to some friend.


Maybe this could be a stumbling block if he was interested in going into animation. But frankly, the way the big companies are hiring, that career is a longshot no matter what.

But comics? Phil Foglio, Fred Perry and others are doing pretty darn okay for themselves in that industry. Nothing's stopping Eric from trying to go down that route.


Trouble is, he doesn't try that route. He doesn't want to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 551

Posted: 12/12/2004 9:39:25 PM     Post subject:  

Estrugo's post/mini-article on Schwartz would be a good companion piece to Computolio's previous articles on the subject, methinks. :)

Im not in the field or anythign, so maybe Im totally wrong.. but I really fail to see how drawing porn of any kind is the end of any career.

Drawing porn is probably not such a big problem in itself... but as ZenZhu and yours truly pointed out earlier in the tread, drawing porn with other people's characters is. Schwarz has, under his TDK alias, overtly violated the intellectual property of others. "Real" publishers or animation studios don't look lightly on that.

Also, while Schwarz has talent, he's not that good. An animation studio that needs talent can go and hire someone like Shawn Keller, who can out-draw anyone in furrydumb.

But comics? Phil Foglio, Fred Perry and others are doing pretty darn okay for themselves in that industry. Nothing's stopping Eric from trying to go down that route.

Except the fact that he's not very productive. Three or four Sabrina Online strips a month, a few colour pics here and there... If you want to make a living in comics, you have to be prolific. Which Schwartz isn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/12/2004 11:38:23 PM     Post subject:  

But which is " worse" ... drawing porn for fun... or drawing porn for money? I draw it for fun... Eric seems to draw it for money!
I draw any fur art for fun.. and pigs! =) I could start selling it when I'll have enuff new shit... but who'd buy prints, since it's all available for free. =)

Oh and Shawn gots his own studio now!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/13/2004 2:31:45 AM     Post subject:  

Oh and Shawn gots his own studio now!

Please give more details. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The New Meat
Vociferator
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 660

Posted: 12/13/2004 3:43:49 AM     Post subject:  

My local comic shop here actually sells bound copies of the Sabrina Online strips, which would indicate that Eric's taken an interest in actually marketing his strips. Can't say how well they're selling, especially since who would buy something that's availbale for free on the web?

I did buy a Bob the Angry Flower collection, but that's different. Bob is funny.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/13/2004 5:41:47 PM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:

Well, if I am properly deciphering your message through the static of inanity that seems to be obscuring its relevance, then I am assuming you are asking if I would rather see a child character as opposed to Minerva Mink or Fifi la Fume. Mind you, as Donnie pointed out, Fifi is a child. She may not be Baby Looney Tunes pedobait, but the character is definitely intended to be a minor.

Your question has about as much relevance to my point as bringing up how mandarin oranges have no relation to mandarin collars during a discussion on airplane mechanics. But, to answer it, I would certainly say no.

Besides, are you suggesting that if Eric didn't do Minerva Mink or Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pictures OR, conversely, allowed Sabrina porn, that the ONLY alternative would be for him to do porn of kiddie characters? If you weren't relatively inept at this whole message board gig, I'd assume that question was a diversionary tactic.. but, while I respect your thoughts and presence here, I just don't think you're savvy enough at this game for that. So I can only assume the question comes from left field.

Let me see if I can clarify the intent of my post.

EWS/TDK does pictures of Minerva Mink, Babs Bunny, Fifi la Fume, other studios' properties et. al. being tentacle raped or whatever... figures no harm, no foul.

EWS insists he is not TDK and is as pure as the new-fallen snow.

EWS rabidly insists Sabrina is beyond the grasp of the spooge hounds, and comes after anyone that dares touch his characters in an adult sense with a hot fire-poker. What's good for the goose is apparently not acceptable for the gander.

EWS deserves a kick in the balls.

See, Ebony... let's say you eventually turned Extinctioners into an animated series on FOX. I drew the spoogiest pic possible of Fenix (I think that's how you spell your character's name)... bad enough to make Mark Parsons, Doug Winger, and Mamabliss collectively vomit. Let's say you were rather pissed that I did such a picture, but I say "tough cookies." Even though it's obviously my style, I insist I didn't draw it... some fellow named ZhuZen did. Then, I draw my own character, and go after anyone that dares draw that character in adult scenes with a vengeance. Don't you think I'd deserve a kick in the balls for that?

As others have said, Schwartz didn't really damn himself simply by drawing porn. By drawing Minerva and Fifi porn, he's shown himself to have no respect for the intellectual properties of companies that may have hired him. I can only assume the folks that had hired him for Earth Force didn't figure he would be drawing their characters being tentacle raped and uploading them to the Web. If they had, it may have been a different story.

And, really, animators drawing raunchy pictures of the characters from the shows they work on is nothing new. I knew a girl that used to work on The Simpsons who showed me some of the stuff they drew during late-night, caffine-fueled brainstorming sessions. They had this little running story where Marge got fed up with Homer choking Bart (one of their inside digs was to speculate that Homer was an abusive husband, too), and wound up tying him to the dinner table and introducing him to one of the business ends of a double-ended dildo.

But, aside from the peeks I got, what happened in that room stayed in that room. It's not like they posted them to the Web. It's not like they had a reputation for Simpsons slash. Really, animators can be a pretty bawdy lot. I'm sure there's quite a few Tiny Toons pics done by the animators themselves. But....... you don't see them flying around the Web, or the animators gaining a following for them, do you?

Schwartz has damaged his reputation enough, however, that.. while animators may be bawdy.. it's not necessarily those folks that you'll be meeting to try and get in the front door. In the case of Harlan Ellison's episode..... no matter how well-liked you may be among your co-workers, if image-conscious execs catch wind of your bawdy hijinks, you can kiss your job.. or job prospects... goodbye. In the eyes of an executive or even a HR manager... hiring Schwartz for a serious animation job with furry characters would be like hiring a cleptomaniac as a night watchman at a jewelry store.

In some ways, I don't think the porn site is the final nail in his coffin. It's just him admitting his coffin has been nailed shut.

As for putting his talents to work.... why doesn't he try for a job like his iconographic fucktoy Sabrina has? He could very well have a future in designing the covers of porn videos and even doing some of those "twisted toon" animated porn videos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mitch
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 473

Posted: 12/13/2004 6:30:30 PM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:

Well, if I am properly deciphering your message through the static of inanity that seems to be obscuring its relevance, then I am assuming you are asking if I would rather see a child character as opposed to Minerva Mink or Fifi la Fume. Mind you, as Donnie pointed out, Fifi is a child. She may not be Baby Looney Tunes pedobait, but the character is definitely intended to be a minor.

Ebony is (I think) referring to the fact that some spoogemongers have produced XXX pix featuring Sabrina's little sister. Whether to deliberately annoy EWS or (God forbid) to serve as actual jerk fodder - who can say? The point I think being that Eric forbade this in his "Guidelines" which IIRC he composed after a certain pic materialized wayyy back in the day featuring Sabrina and her sister. Now in that pic it looked as though the kid sister had innocently wandered in on "the action" and was about to yell out "WHATCHOO DOIN??" but nevertheless it offended a lot of folk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/13/2004 6:33:57 PM     Post subject:  

Two words.. CAAT Studios!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/13/2004 6:38:49 PM     Post subject:  

Ebony is (I think) referring to the fact that some spoogemongers have produced XXX pix featuring Sabrina's little sister. Whether to deliberately annoy EWS or (God forbid) to serve as actual jerk fodder - who can say? The point I think being that Eric forbade this in his "Guidelines" which IIRC he composed after a certain pic materialized wayyy back in the day featuring Sabrina and her sister. Now in that pic it looked as though the kid sister had innocently wandered in on "the action" and was about to yell out "WHATCHOO DOIN??" but nevertheless it offended a lot of folk.

I think I vaguely remember that pic.. and, if I remember correctly, it did just look like she was at the moment of, "What the hell is going on here??" I suppose, then, I should just credit the obscurity of Ebony's question to the fact that his Internet forum skills are still about that of an epileptic monkey operating a backhoe.

Let's get him up to speed, class. Remember, "no child left behind."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/13/2004 6:52:20 PM     Post subject:  

I saw one pic with Sab and Tab and a 2 end dildo.. signed by some "Drunken Berry"!

Ooo.... Let's whack Ebon with soaps, wrapped in towels, at nite! =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kadius
Vociferator
Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 637

Posted: 12/13/2004 11:25:27 PM     Post subject:  

Ooo.... Let's whack Ebon with soaps, wrapped in towels, at nite! =)

A blanket party huh? I'm in, if I can use a lead pipe.

This being my first post in this thread, I'd like to keep it atleast a little on topic. I find it funny that a guy doing porn under an alias, WHO BLATANTLY DENIED DOING IT; has now opened a porn site. When it was clear it was him all along.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:09:44 AM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:

Well, if I am properly deciphering your message through the static of inanity that seems to be obscuring its relevance, then I am assuming you are asking if I would rather see a child character as opposed to Minerva Mink or Fifi la Fume. Mind you, as Donnie pointed out, Fifi is a child. She may not be Baby Looney Tunes pedobait, but the character is definitely intended to be a minor.

Ebony is (I think) referring to the fact that some spoogemongers have produced XXX pix featuring Sabrina's little sister. Whether to deliberately annoy EWS or (God forbid) to serve as actual jerk fodder - who can say? The point I think being that Eric forbade this in his "Guidelines" which IIRC he composed after a certain pic materialized wayyy back in the day featuring Sabrina and her sister. Now in that pic it looked as though the kid sister had innocently wandered in on "the action" and was about to yell out "WHATCHOO DOIN??" but nevertheless it offended a lot of folk.


Yes Mitch, that was what I was getting at. And that picture you described was just the first of a few very disturbing one. To make it worst, the artist included images of child Tabatha getting it on with other artists' "fursona" (for lack of a better term), which would have implied that they okayed it,when in fact they didn't.

As for ZZ's comments about doing 'Phenix', first of all, I'd be impressed if anybody else could actually draw her without making me get chuckle out of it enough to get upset about it. And as for doing the art under an alias and then trying to cover it up, well, I guess, if you were successful at hiding your style then I wouldn't know, if not, then I guess I'd just laugh at you and ask you to stop, of course if your work was impressive, I probably would try to convince you to put you skills to more productive use.

Of course this is just speculation since nothing like that has ever happened, because most of my fans have enough respect for the work and myself not to do such thing. Of course, my work doesn't have sexual overtones like Sabrina always has had from it's very start either to want to encourage people to do so. And well, people don't normally draw my characters very well anyway. If it were really good porn then I'd probably get upset (cause it'd be like, damn, I don't have that kind of imagination).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:15:32 AM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:

Well, if I am properly deciphering your message through the static of inanity that seems to be obscuring its relevance, then I am assuming you are asking if I would rather see a child character as opposed to Minerva Mink or Fifi la Fume. Mind you, as Donnie pointed out, Fifi is a child. She may not be Baby Looney Tunes pedobait, but the character is definitely intended to be a minor.

Your question has about as much relevance to my point as bringing up how mandarin oranges have no relation to mandarin collars during a discussion on airplane mechanics. But, to answer it, I would certainly say no.

Besides, are you suggesting that if Eric didn't do Minerva Mink or Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pictures OR, conversely, allowed Sabrina porn, that the ONLY alternative would be for him to do porn of kiddie characters? If you weren't relatively inept at this whole message board gig, I'd assume that question was a diversionary tactic.. but, while I respect your thoughts and presence here, I just don't think you're savvy enough at this game for that. So I can only assume the question comes from left field.

Let me see if I can clarify the intent of my post.

EWS/TDK does pictures of Minerva Mink, Babs Bunny, Fifi la Fume, other studios' properties et. al. being tentacle raped or whatever... figures no harm, no foul.

EWS insists he is not TDK and is as pure as the new-fallen snow.

EWS rabidly insists Sabrina is beyond the grasp of the spooge hounds, and comes after anyone that dares touch his characters in an adult sense with a hot fire-poker. What's good for the goose is apparently not acceptable for the gander.

EWS deserves a kick in the balls.

See, Ebony... let's say you eventually turned Extinctioners into an animated series on FOX. I drew the spoogiest pic possible of Fenix (I think that's how you spell your character's name)... bad enough to make Mark Parsons, Doug Winger, and Mamabliss collectively vomit. Let's say you were rather pissed that I did such a picture, but I say "tough cookies." Even though it's obviously my style, I insist I didn't draw it... some fellow named ZhuZen did. Then, I draw my own character, and go after anyone that dares draw that character in adult scenes with a vengeance. Don't you think I'd deserve a kick in the balls for that?

As others have said, Schwartz didn't really damn himself simply by drawing porn. By drawing Minerva and Fifi porn, he's shown himself to have no respect for the intellectual properties of companies that may have hired him. I can only assume the folks that had hired him for Earth Force didn't figure he would be drawing their characters being tentacle raped and uploading them to the Web. If they had, it may have been a different story.

And, really, animators drawing raunchy pictures of the characters from the shows they work on is nothing new. I knew a girl that used to work on The Simpsons who showed me some of the stuff they drew during late-night, caffine-fueled brainstorming sessions. They had this little running story where Marge got fed up with Homer choking Bart (one of their inside digs was to speculate that Homer was an abusive husband, too), and wound up tying him to the dinner table and introducing him to one of the business ends of a double-ended dildo.

But, aside from the peeks I got, what happened in that room stayed in that room. It's not like they posted them to the Web. It's not like they had a reputation for Simpsons slash. Really, animators can be a pretty bawdy lot. I'm sure there's quite a few Tiny Toons pics done by the animators themselves. But....... you don't see them flying around the Web, or the animators gaining a following for them, do you?

Schwartz has damaged his reputation enough, however, that.. while animators may be bawdy.. it's not necessarily those folks that you'll be meeting to try and get in the front door. In the case of Harlan Ellison's episode..... no matter how well-liked you may be among your co-workers, if image-conscious execs catch wind of your bawdy hijinks, you can kiss your job.. or job prospects... goodbye. In the eyes of an executive or even a HR manager... hiring Schwartz for a serious animation job with furry characters would be like hiring a cleptomaniac as a night watchman at a jewelry store.

In some ways, I don't think the porn site is the final nail in his coffin. It's just him admitting his coffin has been nailed shut.

As for putting his talents to work.... why doesn't he try for a job like his iconographic fucktoy Sabrina has? He could very well have a future in designing the covers of porn videos and even doing some of those "twisted toon" animated porn videos.


But how do you know his reputation is damaged in any way that prevents him from getting a job he would actively want to seek out. There's no proof or evidence that woud support such speculation for or against really. It's just a common assumption that it might.

Abviously Amiga and the game company he did test work and design work for didn't agree.

Nobody really knows if he has truly actively tried to get into the animation field. Frankly, I doubt that he has, since his location of living isn't exactly a great hub for animation careers, but then he's in the location he's at to help out his family too so. Shrug. If he went to an area of the country where big attention getting animation jobs can be found, who's to really say if he'd be hired or not, save for what we all THINK might happen. You really never know why businesses do or don't hire people,nothings ever as black and white as we sometimes try to make them appear to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:17:16 AM     Post subject:  

Ebony is (I think) referring to the fact that some spoogemongers have produced XXX pix featuring Sabrina's little sister. Whether to deliberately annoy EWS or (God forbid) to serve as actual jerk fodder - who can say? The point I think being that Eric forbade this in his "Guidelines" which IIRC he composed after a certain pic materialized wayyy back in the day featuring Sabrina and her sister. Now in that pic it looked as though the kid sister had innocently wandered in on "the action" and was about to yell out "WHATCHOO DOIN??" but nevertheless it offended a lot of folk.

I think I vaguely remember that pic.. and, if I remember correctly, it did just look like she was at the moment of, "What the hell is going on here??" I suppose, then, I should just credit the obscurity of Ebony's question to the fact that his Internet forum skills are still about that of an epileptic monkey operating a backhoe.

Let's get him up to speed, class. Remember, "no child left behind."


Or your knee jerk reactional need to reply caused you to not think about what I might have meant before hitting the reply button. No need to be insulting when none have been thrown your way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:18:26 AM     Post subject:  

I can't say whether or not the guy is a dick, cuz I don't know him, but anyone that draws Minerva Mink and Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pics then tries to feign innocence and insist their own characters are untouchable by spooge hounds deserves a good kick in the nuts.


Well, would you want to see porn of a character that's supposed to be a child? :?:

Well, if I am properly deciphering your message through the static of inanity that seems to be obscuring its relevance, then I am assuming you are asking if I would rather see a child character as opposed to Minerva Mink or Fifi la Fume. Mind you, as Donnie pointed out, Fifi is a child. She may not be Baby Looney Tunes pedobait, but the character is definitely intended to be a minor.

Your question has about as much relevance to my point as bringing up how mandarin oranges have no relation to mandarin collars during a discussion on airplane mechanics. But, to answer it, I would certainly say no.

Besides, are you suggesting that if Eric didn't do Minerva Mink or Fifi le Fume tentacle rape pictures OR, conversely, allowed Sabrina porn, that the ONLY alternative would be for him to do porn of kiddie characters? If you weren't relatively inept at this whole message board gig, I'd assume that question was a diversionary tactic.. but, while I respect your thoughts and presence here, I just don't think you're savvy enough at this game for that. So I can only assume the question comes from left field.

Let me see if I can clarify the intent of my post.

EWS/TDK does pictures of Minerva Mink, Babs Bunny, Fifi la Fume, other studios' properties et. al. being tentacle raped or whatever... figures no harm, no foul.

EWS insists he is not TDK and is as pure as the new-fallen snow.

EWS rabidly insists Sabrina is beyond the grasp of the spooge hounds, and comes after anyone that dares touch his characters in an adult sense with a hot fire-poker. What's good for the goose is apparently not acceptable for the gander.

EWS deserves a kick in the balls.

See, Ebony... let's say you eventually turned Extinctioners into an animated series on FOX. I drew the spoogiest pic possible of Fenix (I think that's how you spell your character's name)... bad enough to make Mark Parsons, Doug Winger, and Mamabliss collectively vomit. Let's say you were rather pissed that I did such a picture, but I say "tough cookies." Even though it's obviously my style, I insist I didn't draw it... some fellow named ZhuZen did. Then, I draw my own character, and go after anyone that dares draw that character in adult scenes with a vengeance. Don't you think I'd deserve a kick in the balls for that?

As others have said, Schwartz didn't really damn himself simply by drawing porn. By drawing Minerva and Fifi porn, he's shown himself to have no respect for the intellectual properties of companies that may have hired him. I can only assume the folks that had hired him for Earth Force didn't figure he would be drawing their characters being tentacle raped and uploading them to the Web. If they had, it may have been a different story.

And, really, animators drawing raunchy pictures of the characters from the shows they work on is nothing new. I knew a girl that used to work on The Simpsons who showed me some of the stuff they drew during late-night, caffine-fueled brainstorming sessions. They had this little running story where Marge got fed up with Homer choking Bart (one of their inside digs was to speculate that Homer was an abusive husband, too), and wound up tying him to the dinner table and introducing him to one of the business ends of a double-ended dildo.

But, aside from the peeks I got, what happened in that room stayed in that room. It's not like they posted them to the Web. It's not like they had a reputation for Simpsons slash. Really, animators can be a pretty bawdy lot. I'm sure there's quite a few Tiny Toons pics done by the animators themselves. But....... you don't see them flying around the Web, or the animators gaining a following for them, do you?

Schwartz has damaged his reputation enough, however, that.. while animators may be bawdy.. it's not necessarily those folks that you'll be meeting to try and get in the front door. In the case of Harlan Ellison's episode..... no matter how well-liked you may be among your co-workers, if image-conscious execs catch wind of your bawdy hijinks, you can kiss your job.. or job prospects... goodbye. In the eyes of an executive or even a HR manager... hiring Schwartz for a serious animation job with furry characters would be like hiring a cleptomaniac as a night watchman at a jewelry store.

In some ways, I don't think the porn site is the final nail in his coffin. It's just him admitting his coffin has been nailed shut.

As for putting his talents to work.... why doesn't he try for a job like his iconographic fucktoy Sabrina has? He could very well have a future in designing the covers of porn videos and even doing some of those "twisted toon" animated porn videos.


But how do you know his reputation is damaged in any way that prevents him from getting a job he would actively want to seek out. There's no proof or evidence that woud support such speculation for or against really. It's just a common assumption that it might.

Abviously Amiga and the game company he did test work and design work for didn't agree.

Nobody really knows if he has truly actively tried to get into the animation field. Frankly, I doubt that he has, since his location of living isn't exactly a great hub for animation careers, but then he's in the location he's at to help out his family too so. Shrug. If he went to an area of the country where big attention getting animation jobs can be found, who's to really say if he'd be hired or not, save for what we all THINK might happen. You really never know why businesses do or don't hire people,nothings ever as black and white as we sometimes try to make them appear to be.


Would you want to hire a person who draws a huge amount of drawings of anthropomorphic animals getting it on? Highly spoogey ones at that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:38:43 AM     Post subject:  

.

Would you want to hire a person who draws a huge amount of drawings of anthropomorphic animals getting it on? Highly spoogey ones at that?

If the person can draw their asses off and get the product I want done completed quickly and professionally looking, I personally, could care less what they do with their skills off the clock.


A lot of you guys in my opinion have some pretty weird 'hobbies' in my opinion, but if it didn't affect what you were being hired to do, then I can care less if you want to wear women's clothing when you go home or draw porn of Poppa Smurf.

Of course, my opinion is biased because, well, I like anthromorphic artwork and characters and if I can hire somebody that can draw them well, well, if they're drawing high quality spooge, that means they can also draw high quality clean art. I'm paying for them to do the clean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weird_guy_in_the_corner
Venter
Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 258

Posted: 12/14/2004 2:28:30 AM     Post subject:  



Would you want to hire a person who draws a huge amount of drawings of anthropomorphic animals getting it on? Highly spoogey ones at that?


If the person can draw their asses off and get the product I want done completed quickly and professionally looking, I personally, could care less what they do with their skills off the clock.


A lot of you guys in my opinion have some pretty weird 'hobbies' in my opinion, but if it didn't affect what you were being hired to do, then I can care less if you want to wear women's clothing when you go home or draw porn of Poppa Smurf.

Of course, my opinion is biased because, well, I like anthromorphic artwork and characters and if I can hire somebody that can draw them well, well, if they're drawing high quality spooge, that means they can also draw high quality clean art. I'm paying for them to do the clean.


I really don't care what they do off the clock either, but think of public opinion. If the person you hired is well-known for drawing spooge, people will think you knew that as well and hired them anyway. The public might not want to do business with you, not to mention any partners you might have may do the same thing. I'm not saying this is likely but it could happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218

Posted: 12/14/2004 4:07:30 AM     Post subject:  



Would you want to hire a person who draws a huge amount of drawings of anthropomorphic animals getting it on? Highly spoogey ones at that?


If the person can draw their asses off and get the product I want done completed quickly and professionally looking, I personally, could care less what they do with their skills off the clock.


A lot of you guys in my opinion have some pretty weird 'hobbies' in my opinion, but if it didn't affect what you were being hired to do, then I can care less if you want to wear women's clothing when you go home or draw porn of Poppa Smurf.

Of course, my opinion is biased because, well, I like anthromorphic artwork and characters and if I can hire somebody that can draw them well, well, if they're drawing high quality spooge, that means they can also draw high quality clean art. I'm paying for them to do the clean.


I really don't care what they do off the clock either, but think of public opinion. If the person you hired is well-known for drawing spooge, people will think you knew that as well and hired them anyway. The public might not want to do business with you, not to mention any partners you might have may do the same thing. I'm not saying this is likely but it could happen.



Yeah, but he's only well known to US, those who are aware of the furry fandom and the like. And he's really only a big deal because those in the furry fandom has made him so. And when you really think about it, how many normal people are even aware of furry anyway? Of all the genre that border on Sci Fi, how many people would you figure know who he is?
I'm willing to bet really not that many.

As big a deal we all like to think that people who are involved in furry are, we're really not that big a deal outside of ourselves. I mean, think about the people who get discussed here as if they're such big shots or something, when in truth, you only knew them because you know of and have interest in furry stuff. Otherwise, nobody really cares who any of the artists or 'names' in furry are. It's silly to get a big head in such a small fandom anyway, because it's like being the king of the Dodos. You may think you're big stuff, but in truth, you're only the king of a very small number of folks who care, one way or another.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/14/2004 5:42:57 AM     Post subject:  


...the king of the Dodos...


Oh, no... We're starting to get quite AFFesque here. I don't mean for this particular phrase, but because how the whole thread has evolved so far.

"EWS opened a porn site".
"That folk is an hypocrital."
"hey, folks, why are you being so rough on EWS"
"Because he's an hypocrital".
"And 'cause he sold his soul to drooling fanbois instead of getting a career as an animator"
"Oh yeah, he loses"
"But how selling one's soul to drooling fanbois makes you a loser?"
"'Cause he could have gone much farther than that."
"But that doesn't mean he could do it."
"But he doesn't."
"He's got to care of his poor parents"
"So he draws porn 'cause of that!?"
"No. But he's far away from the animation areas and the stuff. And how come drawing porn means you can't be a good animator?"
"'Cause people won't hire you."
"And how do you know, huh? Who cares about furry fandom outside the fandom?"


I don't know about you, folks, but, to me, the main question has been already answered. I've contributed to it by explaining why in my opinion Eric W. Schwartz has failed to accomplish the expectatives many people, including yours truly, had on him in the early 90s, and why I think opening that porn site means he's choosing the wrong alternative. :b

Of course, we can examine the reasons given with a huge magnifying glass and give out theories about perception of furry fandom outside its boundaries. Making theories is free, and stretching reality to one's theories is also possible. On the same fashion, we also could have a discussion about market mechanics, history of morals and ethic, social customs of the Polynesian cultures, offer and demand laws, seduction of the innocent and if it's true or not that Russians have supersonic torpedoes. We can easily forget the point of this discussion and try to impose our superiority at knocking a keyboard at our rival/oponent/whatever. AFF behavior on its purest form.

But it's all useless. The main question has been already answered. Eric W. Schwartz disappointed me, and some other people on this forum, as far as I can tell. And, to read my reasons, just go and read my posts on this thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLaitila
Vociferator
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 408

Posted: 12/14/2004 10:52:53 AM     Post subject:  

A little off topic here, but I hafta admit I drew a really crappy artica-nude back in the day which was never posted online. It's somewhere in the closet with all other papers and it's NEVER COMING OUT!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Vociferator
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 666

Posted: 12/14/2004 1:49:55 PM     Post subject:  

Let's ask the "What if"- Machine if eric has a third secret identity no one but no one knows about...
A successfull secret persona he calls.. Jerry Bruckheimer! =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353

Posted: 12/14/2004 2:49:22 PM     Post subject:  

Let's ask the "What if"- Machine if eric has a third secret identity no one but no one knows about...
A successfull secret persona he calls.. Jerry Bruckheimer! =)


Drats! I've been discovered!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Psy Fox
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 14

Posted: 12/14/2004 8:11:09 PM     Post subject:  

Im not in the field or anythign, so maybe Im totally wrong.. but I really fail to see how drawing porn of any kind is the end of any career.

Ive pointed out before. People who really know how to talk to people can get what they want (a job, friends, girls, whatever, anything.)


Yeah, theres going to be discretion involved on the part of an employer. Like if your REALLY well-known for really fucked up art they might not want your name on the top of a production, but its not like they couldnt use a pseudonym for you if it that was that bad (and the key being they wanted to hire you). Reed Waller ran into some stuff cuz he was known for doing Omaha and far as I heard thats basically what they did.

If Eric wanted to work in animation Im sure he could. I think the reason that he isn't is that the jobs just arn't there in quantity coupled with the fact he cannot provide what an employer wants (thats my guess).


Your right, take the Sabrina strip, take away the artwork and just look at the story and you can see EWS is totaly under developed in story telling as many furry artist seem to be.

Lets compare Paul Dini to EWS (I know a bit unfair as Dini is a industry vet) the big difference is Dini can entertain without using his art (and does). Shove EWS in front of a keyboard and you'll get crap which is not a bad thing if teamed up with a good writer but this rare in furrydumb as in the furry universe, art is everything and nobody wants to be known as just a writer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kadius
Vociferator
Joined: 10 Feb 2004
Posts: 637

Posted: 12/14/2004 10:38:55 PM     Post subject:  

Your right, take the Sabrina strip, take away the artwork and just look at the story and you can see EWS is totaly under developed in story telling as many furry artist seem to be.

"Hey, I'll draw what happened on furnet/taps last night because it was funny!"

I think the fact is that many furries simply can't write.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZenZhu
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 1510

Posted: 12/15/2004 5:21:32 PM     Post subject:  

No need to be insulting when none have been thrown your way.

Sorry. You haven't been insulting, but I just find you really irritating. Not in a "OMG, DIE FURRY PAGAN DIE!" way.. but in the same way I find the modern inability to use an apostrophe annoying. (e.g., "Trader Joe say's no smoking in the restroom's.".... seriously, I saw that sign this weekend) Your style of interaction just preys on some of my pet peeves.... like visiting your parents and seeing the clock on the VCR that you gave them for Christmas two years ago is still blinking 12:00 because they never bothered to learn how to program it. Sorry for lashing out.

As I said in the other post, I'm just trying to find some way to encourage you to communicate more effectively so you can contribute better to these discussions. I've tried being civil, so I figured sarcasm would work. When you make obscure references to a picture someone isn't familiar with and, in the process, make your question seem like some kind of out-in-left-field inquiry as to whether child pornongraphy is better than Sabrina porn, it does generate a kind of "WTF??" response. Seriously, though, it would help a lot of folks out if you can get the hang of the posting mechanics here, so your posts are easier to follow.

Now that I've taken a stab at giving you a wake-up call to how obtuse some of your statements can be, I'll go back to relative civility. Really, though, there's nothing innately wrong with your posting methods.... I just have learn to overlook them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message