Author |
Message |
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 353
|
Posted: 1/17/2005 10:26:44 PM
Post subject: Er, uh... who did this? |
|
|
Somebody wrote an entry about furries on this site: http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Furries
The species-dysmorphic.
This is what happens when kids are raised by television cartoons, constantly told to play with talking teddy bears, or excessively roleplay the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles RPG. A more gentle view is of modern Animism. Furries are disturbing due to the intricate, full-body suits - known as fursuits - some build and a few wear during sex. Furry artwork tends to species-blend and be overtly sexual. Furries claim to be born the way they are, like fags, but they're actually just delusional and chose to be furry to fit in with someone, as every other subculture has rejected them. packetgrinder theorizes most furries are simply run-of-the-mill fags who are too grotesque to convince others have anal sex with them unless their flabby zit-covered bodies are completely cloaked in a 50/50 cotton-poly tiger costume.
Note that they added a link to CYD on the bottom. :) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rankin
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 03 Jan 2004
Posts: 1514
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 12:31:25 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
It should be a lynx costume, rather than a tiger costume... then it would be "spot" on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RailFoxen
Venter
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 251
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 1:09:39 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Gahahahahah. Twenty bonus points to the Internet. I'm goin' to the park to play catch with my wolf spirit now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stoneth
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 545
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 1:54:33 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting find. BTW, I don't believe I've seen this website before. Is it trying to be like Wikipedia or something? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SquareMoogle
Venter
Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 238
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 2:23:29 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Not quite, it's a comedy site and they already have a bunch of furry shit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mairi
Qualificator
Joined: 17 Jun 2004
Posts: 2
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 2:56:22 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Ohhhgods, I explored, and they reposted a Bernal pic. WHo wants to start the pot on when he finds out, and starts working to sue? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Banrai
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 314
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 3:20:20 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Ohhhgods, I explored, and they reposted a Bernal pic. WHo wants to start the pot on when he finds out, and starts working to sue?
dude, which pic is that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RailFoxen
Venter
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 251
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xarai
Apocrisiary
Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 44
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 4:27:55 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Wikipedia has articles on furry, furry fandom, and yiff.
The furry article on Wikipedia used to have a link to CYD, but a furry (surprise!) reverted it, leaving the link to nothingkat, strangely enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Banrai
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 314
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 4:38:57 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, I thought that was the pic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skunkfuckers Inc.
Needs to get out more
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 980
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 4:12:20 PM
Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, I thought that was the pic.
One of the ones freely available on www.yiff.ru anyway.
BTW, it's interesting to compare this to the more 'mainstream' Wikipedia entry on "furries". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Quantum Coyote
Venter
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 221
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 4:30:41 PM
Post subject: Re: Er, uh... who did this? |
|
|
Somebody wrote an entry about furries on this site: http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Furries
Note that they added a link to CYD on the bottom. :)
Hrm, slanted but mostly true.. For instance:
Typically Associated with Furries
plushies
voraphiles
unbirthing
macrophiles
Typically associated with furries? Ok, plushies, a GOOD number of furries at least own a stuffed animal, so thats pretty frekken true.. but the others?
Well I certainly know the fandom has changed alot over the years I've been peeking around, but I would hope that it hasn't reached the state where some of these other things, well, actually now that I think about it macrophiles are pretty prominent.. uhh my margin is shrinking. hmm, the vores have been gaining alot of ground lately.... unbirthing is related to that in a way.. aw shit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skunkfuckers Inc.
Needs to get out more
Joined: 20 Jan 2004
Posts: 980
|
Posted: 1/18/2005 6:14:52 PM
Post subject: Re: Er, uh... who did this? |
|
|
Hrm, slanted but mostly true.. For instance:
Typically Associated with Furries
plushies
voraphiles
unbirthing
macrophiles
Typically associated with furries? Ok, plushies, a GOOD number of furries at least own a stuffed animal, so thats pretty frekken true.. but the others?
Well I certainly know the fandom has changed alot over the years I've been peeking around, but I would hope that it hasn't reached the state where some of these other things, well, actually now that I think about it macrophiles are pretty prominent.. uhh my margin is shrinking. hmm, the vores have been gaining alot of ground lately.... unbirthing is related to that in a way.. aw shit
ALL YUOR INTARNETS ARE NWO BELONG TO FURREHS!!!!1!!1Z!
The whole of the internet is at stake. Mission? We gotta drop some knowledge on they dumb selves befoe it too late. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Quantum Coyote
Venter
Joined: 12 May 2004
Posts: 221
|
Posted: 1/19/2005 4:45:02 AM
Post subject: |
|
|
My bad. "reached *A* state"
:) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ebonyleopard
Venter
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 218
|
Posted: 1/23/2005 6:18:41 AM
Post subject: Re: Er, uh... who did this? |
|
|
Somebody wrote an entry about furries on this site: http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Furries
The species-dysmorphic.
This is what happens when kids are raised by television cartoons, constantly told to play with talking teddy bears, or excessively roleplay the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles RPG. A more gentle view is of modern Animism. Furries are disturbing due to the intricate, full-body suits - known as fursuits - some build and a few wear during sex. Furry artwork tends to species-blend and be overtly sexual. Furries claim to be born the way they are, like fags, but they're actually just delusional and chose to be furry to fit in with someone, as every other subculture has rejected them. packetgrinder theorizes most furries are simply run-of-the-mill fags who are too grotesque to convince others have anal sex with them unless their flabby zit-covered bodies are completely cloaked in a 50/50 cotton-poly tiger costume.
Note that they added a link to CYD on the bottom. :)
Is it just me or am I the only one that's more bothered by the fact somebody actually took the time to sit in front of a computer and type all that stuff out in the first place?
What's stranger the fetish that's reported or the person who does the looking for stuff to report on the festish? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|