Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Crush...Yiff...Destroy!
The CYD Forum Archive
 

According to Seanbaby, LARPers are worse than furries
   Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Forum Archive Index -> Chit Chat
Author Message
Computolio
Coadjutor
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 349

Posted: 10/10/2003 7:18:58 PM     Post subject: According to Seanbaby, LARPers are worse than furries  

Interesting development to say the least. I mean, this is SEANBABY, the man who practically invented the modern "hilarious rant article" style of internet humor. It's odd to see an early Portal Of Evil supporter and senior internet idiocy expert actually put furries as the #2 worst thing in geekdom. I mean, LARPers are BAD BAD BAD but they just can't hold a candle to the furries in terms of sheer dysfunctionality.

Also: -9.2% damage to one's sex life? QUALITY NOT QUANTITY SIR JAILHOUSE GAY DOESN'T COUNT CHEATING CHEATING CHEATING
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wayd Wolf
Coadjutor
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 456

Posted: 10/11/2003 1:30:16 AM     Post subject: Re: According to Seanbaby, LARPers are worse than furries  

Interesting development to say the least. I mean, this is SEANBABY, the man who practically invented the modern "hilarious rant article" style of internet humor. It's odd to see an early Portal Of Evil supporter and senior internet idiocy expert actually put furries as the #2 worst thing in geekdom. I mean, LARPers are BAD BAD BAD but they just can't hold a candle to the furries in terms of sheer dysfunctionality.

Also: -9.2% damage to one's sex life? QUALITY NOT QUANTITY SIR JAILHOUSE GAY DOESN'T COUNT CHEATING CHEATING CHEATING


He'd probably put furries back at Number 1 if they fursuited in public in large groups as opposed to the goth kids playing vampire down at the mall. ONE group playing out an issue of Associated Student Bodies in the food court and he'd change his mind... not to mention furries ending up on Nightline.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mouse
Coadjutor
Joined: 13 Jul 2003
Posts: 662

Posted: 10/11/2003 6:55:22 AM     Post subject:  

yes but more importantly , the Wave magazine ....

holy fuck do they have atrocious taste in cars


with the exception of the toyota century and the opel "speedster turbo"

(even though speedster turbo is an awful name)

id like the specs on that toyota v-12 cuz usually v-12 are small...i was shocked to find out that ferraris v-12 was 3.0L
same for the jag v-12 only pushing liek 250hp (which is nothign to scoff at but cmon)
no torque, no thanks

i always wondered why toyota since they were gonna sell cars here didnt make a big sedan apperently they did the only turn off if that $90k price tag fuck that

and if that opels a "super-car" like they say it is then $42000 is a steal

i dont really give a shit about new cars because almost all of them suck - however the ones that i think are good is that austarlian holden monaro that supposed to be 500hp - ALL motor (?)
i heard they still make ford rancheros down, maybe baird can answer taht one for me

mercury marauder - nice sedan 300 hp
supposed to supercharged along with the ford version the blackhawk in 2005 - might bring it up to 500hp or so and for what the price will probably fall around $30-$40

that new GTO

i would LOVE to see a muscle car war get started again in the states

i dont know why they say they cant sell the opel (german buick) here...maybe there is some sort of performance tax on shit
i heard about that with those new hemi dodge trucks and vipers and shit

but what the fuck they gotta do it like they did back inthe 60s
those cars were dirt cheap

hemi/440 6bbl roadrunners (actually all companies not just mopar)

they took thier bottom of the line car and shoehorned the biggest most powerful motors they had in those

they actually had power , nowadays build the fucking thing out of fiberglass and its all gearing and turbos
then slap its 1/4 mile time on it ..fuckers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message