You yanks just got SERVED

Sorry about that old bean, bally bad show wotwot. Must dash, Polo match with the chaps at the club in an hour

You yanks just got SERVED

Sorry about that old bean, bally bad show wotwot. Must dash, Polo match with the chaps at the club in an hour

SILENCE, CRUMPET.

I assume CYD would fall under this law? People hiding under pseudonyms posting messages annoying innocent furries! Good thing it's a British site. :wink:

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

clearly a chimp

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

clearly a chimp

But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

clearly a chimp

But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone

but let's face it ..Bush is just reminiscent of a monkey look at the man

it's just a caricture

besides since when do furries look at the animals from a purely scientific angle.. they go with stereotypes

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

clearly a chimp

But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone

but let's face it ..Bush is just reminiscent of a monkey look at the man

it's just a caricture

besides since when do furries look at the animals from a purely scientific angle.. they go with stereotypes

Yeah but you don't see many furries choosing chimps as their main character. They go for foxes and rabbits etc

I'm taking about what kind of a furry would bush be, not what animal he looks most like (because you're absolutely right on the chimp thing)

I always imagined Osama Bin Laden as a Camel...

PRESIDENT BUSH WOULD BE A SLUG BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SLIMEY AND ALSO BECAUSE THEY PASS VAGUE USELESS LAWS

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

A starfish.

They don't have brains, either.

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

A starfish.

They don't have brains, either.

He is a pink chocolate filled starfish. Thats for sure.

Bush would be one of those pedigree dogs, the ones that look pretty but have had the brains bred out of them. They bark at everything and pee all over the rug when they get excited without even realizing or caring.

Me? I'm gonna keep right on annoying people anonymously. I defy the long arm of the law to prosecute, because I'd be kind of honored to be the plaintiff that goes to the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of this law.

That is, if anybody actually thought it was worth the effort to research my identity and prosecute. Even if it stays on the books, isn't the FBI too busy trying to catch child molestors and terrorists to give a shit about people being anonymously annoying on the internet?

You know what? I don't even care anymore. I am just riding this presidency out and hoping that most people have learned from their choice of votes.

BUT APPARENTLY THE DUMBSHIT VOTERS NEVER FUCKING LEARN!

BUT APPARENTLY THE DUMBSHIT VOTERS NEVER FUCKING LEARN!

AND HOW

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?

I go with what was said earlier and say he is a chimp.
Perfect match.

HELLO? FBI!? SOMEONE IS HARASSING ME ON THE INTERNET!!!

"So now that the lines in the WikiWar have been drawn, I'll state for the record that I'm over here on the side of responsible netizens who'd like to see Wikipedia remain a useful resource, and don't need the government stepping in to play Nanny. On the other side, we've got the problem children whose only evidence they don't need supervising is them screeching "LOL YUO'RE TAKEING TEH INTARWEB TOO SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!11!", who won't see any reason to change until it actually effects them.

"But by then it'll be too late, won't it?"

But it wouldn't be the Internet if people didn't read headlines and detonate in an explosion of pure stupidity. Perhaps they need to stop taking the Internet so seriously.

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

That may be the intent of the law, yes. But these days a lot of people don't really trust the government to adhere to the spirit of the law anymore, so wording that permits the potential for abuse has to be watched for carefully. We're talking about an administration that is trying to weasel out of the Geneva convention, here.

Hi, I would just like to remind you all about how this topic is about a law, not about how much you hate W. Thanks.

Something that needs to be brought to everyones attention......I'm sorry admins...I include penis for everyone to look at but this link is important

I like how everyone blames this solely on Bush. While hes certainly got a role to play in this awful bill, its the Senate that origionaly passed it as a rider to a violence against women act.

Dont get me wrong, I'm not blind Bush supporter I think his domestic policies suck ass. I'm just pointing out theres enough blame to go around. And to be fair, if he vetoed the bill, I'm sure some of the people on the left side of the isle would be blasting him as "Promoting violence against women" or some shit.

He just couldnt win in this case.

But Bush is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Bush bashing

Mitch

EDIT: just checking the word filters! :lol:

Mitch

EDIT: just checking the word filters! :lol:

But Mitch is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Mitch bashing

The only thing more fun than Mitch Bashing is Blair Bashing ;)

But Mitch is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Mitch bashing

The only thing more fun than Mitch Bashing is Blair Bashing ;)

no seriously we'll take him.... that's a huge trade up.

Now can we change 'fag' to 'cigarette'?

so who the fuck do I talk to about the bitchpile thats sending me emails about how I need to make my dick bigger?

you're all annoying!!! i'm reporting you all to teh INTORNAT POILICE!!!

A hooker who doesn't mind your small dick would be the person you need to get in touch with over that. :wink:

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

Essentially, this is law is about stalking. If it wasn't stalking before, it isn't stalking now. But it wouldn't be the Internet if people didn't read headlines and detonate in an explosion of pure stupidity. Perhaps they need to stop taking the Internet so seriously.

any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person;

Now that I think about it, President Chimpy McFlightsuit would be the perfect candidate for a furry fan.

He can't differentiate between REALITY and his own delusional fantasies either!

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.