Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Crush...Yiff...Destroy!
The CYD Forum Archive
 

Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
   Crush...Yiff...Destroy! Forum Archive Index -> News
Author Message
m_estrugo
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 547

Posted: 1/9/2006 7:47:08 PM     Post subject: Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.  

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance%2C+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr. Dos
Vociferator
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 731

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:06:36 PM     Post subject:  

Dear Furries,

Leo Monelli.

Hugs and kisses, yiffs and scritches,
Dr. Dos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Cowgirl
Needs to get out more
Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 1151

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:11:29 PM     Post subject:  

That's it, I'm moving to Canada.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:14:14 PM     Post subject:  

You yanks just got SERVED

Sorry about that old bean, bally bad show wotwot. Must dash, Polo match with the chaps at the club in an hour
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Cowgirl
Needs to get out more
Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 1151

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:15:05 PM     Post subject:  

You yanks just got SERVED

Sorry about that old bean, bally bad show wotwot. Must dash, Polo match with the chaps at the club in an hour

SILENCE, CRUMPET.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:15:34 PM     Post subject:  

You yanks just got SERVED

Sorry about that old bean, bally bad show wotwot. Must dash, Polo match with the chaps at the club in an hour

SILENCE, CRUMPET.


You Prince of Wales!

You Bit of Tail!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Needs to get out more
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 1139

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:18:50 PM     Post subject:  

I assume CYD would fall under this law? People hiding under pseudonyms posting messages annoying innocent furries! Good thing it's a British site. :wink:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:22:09 PM     Post subject:  

I assume CYD would fall under this law? People hiding under pseudonyms posting messages annoying innocent furries! Good thing it's a British site. :wink:


'Course it is me ol mucker *nudge* a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:28:20 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:32:08 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
creature
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 529

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:35:13 PM     Post subject:  

Well, I'm fucked. Unless this is grandfathered, in which case I think I can safely have half the Internet community arrested.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nopedestrian
Prattler
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 142

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:38:35 PM     Post subject:  

If someone is that bothered by criticism on the internet for stupid things that they say here, then they should probably turn off their computer and go find something else to occupy their time with.

I can see the hilarious consequences of this already. MAN JAILED 2 YEARS FOR FLAMING BLOG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:39:38 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
clearly a chimp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:42:21 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
clearly a chimp


But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:45:22 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
clearly a chimp


But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone


but let's face it ..Bush is just reminiscent of a monkey look at the man

it's just a caricture

besides since when do furries look at the animals from a purely scientific angle.. they go with stereotypes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:50:00 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
clearly a chimp


But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone


but let's face it ..Bush is just reminiscent of a monkey look at the man

it's just a caricture

besides since when do furries look at the animals from a purely scientific angle.. they go with stereotypes


Yeah but you don't see many furries choosing chimps as their main character. They go for foxes and rabbits etc

I'm taking about what kind of a furry would bush be, not what animal he looks most like (because you're absolutely right on the chimp thing)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:52:43 PM     Post subject:  

Texas longhorn, because he has no imagination.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/9/2006 8:54:02 PM     Post subject:  

That settles it, George Bush is a furry...


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?
clearly a chimp


But chimps are actually quite intellegent, it's an insult to chimps

I see him as one of those annoying dogs that are all yap but no backbone


but let's face it ..Bush is just reminiscent of a monkey look at the man

it's just a caricture

besides since when do furries look at the animals from a purely scientific angle.. they go with stereotypes


Yeah but you don't see many furries choosing chimps as their main character. They go for foxes and rabbits etc

I'm taking about what kind of a furry would bush be, not what animal he looks most like (because you're absolutely right on the chimp thing)


He'd probably be an eagle

for Amurca
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Erdwolf_TVL
Qualificator
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 31

Posted: 1/9/2006 9:46:02 PM     Post subject:  

I always imagined Osama Bin Laden as a Camel...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/9/2006 9:47:19 PM     Post subject:  

I always imagined Osama Bin Laden as a Camel...


some kind of ferret always sprung to my mind
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Cowgirl
Needs to get out more
Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 1151

Posted: 1/9/2006 9:50:10 PM     Post subject:  

Eh, Bush would have to be some kind of rodent. Something sort of dopey looking.
And Bin Laden is definetley a goat. I mean, come on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stoneth
Needs to get out more
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 1267

Posted: 1/9/2006 10:08:35 PM     Post subject:  

Bush is an elephant or a sheep. As for this law, I sincerely doubt that this will fly in the States. There is no way to regulate it. It also violates the First Ammendment. Part of freedom of speech means freedom for everyone, not just you. There is not nor should there be any law that prevents one from being offended or annoyed. Perhaps I should be thankful for the fact that I don't live in the US right now. I guess I'd better cherish my right to say that Eric Schwartz is fat hyphocritical asshat without having to use my name.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nopedestrian
Prattler
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 142

Posted: 1/9/2006 10:19:17 PM     Post subject:  

PRESIDENT BUSH WOULD BE A SLUG BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SLIMEY AND ALSO BECAUSE THEY PASS VAGUE USELESS LAWS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/9/2006 10:40:13 PM     Post subject:  

PRESIDENT BUSH WOULD BE A SLUG BECAUSE THEY ARE SO SLIMEY AND ALSO BECAUSE THEY PASS VAGUE USELESS LAWS

being vague isn't useless... it allows them to abuse power without it being clearly illegal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beauty of Nature
Venter
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 246

Posted: 1/9/2006 10:44:57 PM     Post subject:  

I am soooo e-noyed by this.
Anyone know a good lawyer that can get me millions of $ for it ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoManVanGogh
Vociferator
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 678

Posted: 1/9/2006 10:55:47 PM     Post subject:  

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?


A starfish.

They don't have brains, either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beauty of Nature
Venter
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 246

Posted: 1/9/2006 11:03:11 PM     Post subject:  

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?


A starfish.

They don't have brains, either.


He is a pink chocolate filled starfish. Thats for sure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/9/2006 11:05:13 PM     Post subject:  

If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?


A starfish.

They don't have brains, either.


He is a pink chocolate filled starfish. Thats for sure.


But Bush doesn't care about black people
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkey King
Vociferator
Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 488

Posted: 1/9/2006 11:20:39 PM     Post subject:  

Bush would be one of those pedigree dogs, the ones that look pretty but have had the brains bred out of them. They bark at everything and pee all over the rug when they get excited without even realizing or caring.

Me? I'm gonna keep right on annoying people anonymously. I defy the long arm of the law to prosecute, because I'd be kind of honored to be the plaintiff that goes to the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of this law.

That is, if anybody actually thought it was worth the effort to research my identity and prosecute. Even if it stays on the books, isn't the FBI too busy trying to catch child molestors and terrorists to give a shit about people being anonymously annoying on the internet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 12:04:20 AM     Post subject:  

Bush would be one of those pedigree dogs, the ones that look pretty but have had the brains bred out of them. They bark at everything and pee all over the rug when they get excited without even realizing or caring.

Me? I'm gonna keep right on annoying people anonymously. I defy the long arm of the law to prosecute, because I'd be kind of honored to be the plaintiff that goes to the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of this law.

That is, if anybody actually thought it was worth the effort to research my identity and prosecute. Even if it stays on the books, isn't the FBI too busy trying to catch child molestors and terrorists to give a shit about people being anonymously annoying on the internet?


Oh isn't that cute, you think the FBI has it's priorities straight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Donotsue
Needs to get out more
Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 892

Posted: 1/10/2006 12:10:43 AM     Post subject:  

Did George get too much harassing mail on his intarwebs of why such a law?
...And if this is applicable in US only.. then tuff shit! I am beyond his reach!

It's the hoose-gow for Hirtes tho! =)

But how bout this..?

Bush Advisor Says President Has Legal Power to Torture Children

John Yoo publicly argued there is no law that could prevent the President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect
in custody including by crushing that childs testicles.

http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=504353


I'm tafe in hewe from that ol' puddy tat...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wtf
Prattler
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 199

Posted: 1/10/2006 1:27:12 AM     Post subject:  

Wow. I guess the war on porn is won?

Who even cares about terror.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EFudd
Prattler
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 181

Posted: 1/10/2006 3:31:30 AM     Post subject:  

You know what this also does? If they can't harass people online, then this will only escalate things into a one-on-one confrontation. Which is worst saying, "Such and Such is a so and so" - Somedood. Or, fist fights and street gang violence increases?

Something Awful could easily be the target of Wikifur for fucking up thier page. Think of that!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stinkweedskunk
Prattler
Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 155

Posted: 1/10/2006 4:11:04 AM     Post subject:  

You know what? I don't even care anymore. I am just riding this presidency out and hoping that most people have learned from their choice of votes. Every republican I talk to admits to Geedubbyah being the worst mistake in election history, and played on people's patriotism by riding on the 9/11 and Iraq "America...fuck yeah!" bandwagon. And for the record, you do not support the soldiers in Iraq any less by being against the war.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Coyote Seven
Qualificator
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 33

Posted: 1/10/2006 7:41:15 AM     Post subject:  

You know what? I don't even care anymore. I am just riding this presidency out and hoping that most people have learned from their choice of votes.


You know, I would have thought that would have been so after Ronald Reagan...

BUT APPARENTLY THE DUMBSHIT VOTERS NEVER FUCKING LEARN!

I swear, you should need a Ph.D and a licence to vote. Of course that would keep me out, but at this point I don't think I care anymore. :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/10/2006 8:41:31 AM     Post subject:  


BUT APPARENTLY THE DUMBSHIT VOTERS NEVER FUCKING LEARN!


AND HOW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheBobSays
Venter
Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 260

Posted: 1/10/2006 9:01:21 AM     Post subject:  


BUT APPARENTLY THE DUMBSHIT VOTERS NEVER FUCKING LEARN!


AND HOW


Blame me: I voted for Nader.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Myke Greywolf
Qualificator
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 3

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:15:40 AM     Post subject:  


If George Bush were a Furry, what furry would be be? What animal?


A donkey, of course. Slow-witted, stubborn and not too bright.

Oh, you're saying he can't be a donkey because he's a republican? Well, democans, republicrats, who can tell them apart nowadays?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beauty of Nature
Venter
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 246

Posted: 1/10/2006 4:24:38 PM     Post subject:  

I go with what was said earlier and say he is a chimp.
Perfect match.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/10/2006 4:26:08 PM     Post subject:  

I go with what was said earlier and say he is a chimp.
Perfect match.


Wow, I wasn't convinced till I saw that o_o That's shocking
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Banrai
Vociferator
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 575

Posted: 1/10/2006 4:28:36 PM     Post subject:  

HELLO? FBI!? SOMEONE IS HARASSING ME ON THE INTERNET!!!



Riiight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mitch
Vociferator
Joined: 01 Jun 2003
Posts: 670

Posted: 1/10/2006 5:22:04 PM     Post subject: Hahahaha  

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

Essentially, this is law is about stalking. If it wasn't stalking before, it isn't stalking now. But it wouldn't be the Internet if people didn't read headlines and detonate in an explosion of pure stupidity. Perhaps they need to stop taking the Internet so seriously.

"So now that the lines in the WikiWar have been drawn, I'll state for the record that I'm over here on the side of responsible netizens who'd like to see Wikipedia remain a useful resource, and don't need the government stepping in to play Nanny. On the other side, we've got the problem children whose only evidence they don't need supervising is them screeching "LOL YUO'RE TAKEING TEH INTARWEB TOO SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!11!", who won't see any reason to change until it actually effects them.

"But by then it'll be too late, won't it?"


Oh, Xydexx :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CI
Rasophore
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 61

Posted: 1/10/2006 6:23:00 PM     Post subject: Re: Hahahaha  

But it wouldn't be the Internet if people didn't read headlines and detonate in an explosion of pure stupidity. Perhaps they need to stop taking the Internet so seriously.

Bahahahahaha! That's what I realised the first day I encountered online message boards...

Frankly, I think it's typified by getting all hot and bothered about 'the right to annoy people'. I know you're talking about free speech, but frankly y'all could have worded it a little better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkey King
Vociferator
Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 488

Posted: 1/10/2006 6:54:27 PM     Post subject: Re: Hahahaha  

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

That may be the intent of the law, yes. But these days a lot of people don't really trust the government to adhere to the spirit of the law anymore, so wording that permits the potential for abuse has to be watched for carefully. We're talking about an administration that is trying to weasel out of the Geneva convention, here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 7:29:16 PM     Post subject: Re: Hahahaha  

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

That may be the intent of the law, yes. But these days a lot of people don't really trust the government to adhere to the spirit of the law anymore, so wording that permits the potential for abuse has to be watched for carefully. We're talking about an administration that is trying to weasel out of the Geneva convention, here.


We do not torture (under our newly crafted definition of torture in which anything less than permanent organ damage and death does not count)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/10/2006 7:50:46 PM     Post subject:  

Hi, I would just like to remind you all about how this topic is about a law, not about how much you hate W. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 7:56:04 PM     Post subject:  

Hi, I would just like to remind you all about how this topic is about a law, not about how much you hate W. Thanks.


But we hate him alot... I mean like mid 30's approval rating alot
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zod God
Prattler
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 113

Posted: 1/10/2006 8:38:33 PM     Post subject:  

I like how everyone blames this solely on Bush. While hes certainly got a role to play in this awful bill, its the Congress that origionaly passed it as a rider to a violence against women act.

Dont get me wrong, I'm not blind Bush supporter I think his domestic policies suck ass. I'm just pointing out theres enough blame to go around. And to be fair, if he vetoed the bill, I'm sure some of the people on the left side of the isle would be blasting him as "Promoting violence against women" or some shit.

He just couldnt win in this case.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Iconoclastic
Vociferator
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 361

Posted: 1/10/2006 8:45:05 PM     Post subject:  

The furry media of choice has already picked up on this!

Something that needs to be brought to everyones attention......I'm sorry admins...I include penis for everyone to look at but this link is important


NSFW! http://fchan.hentaiplanet.net/m/res/4391.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 8:48:04 PM     Post subject:  

I like how everyone blames this solely on Bush. While hes certainly got a role to play in this awful bill, its the Senate that origionaly passed it as a rider to a violence against women act.

Dont get me wrong, I'm not blind Bush supporter I think his domestic policies suck ass. I'm just pointing out theres enough blame to go around. And to be fair, if he vetoed the bill, I'm sure some of the people on the left side of the isle would be blasting him as "Promoting violence against women" or some shit.

He just couldnt win in this case.


Oh it's not that, I understand our whole system of creating and passing bills is horribly flawed in that it is so cumbersome that they have to pass stuff with nasty riders and tacked on pork or they would never pass a bill.... of course it's all the fault of the people who tacked the shitty part on.

But Bush is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Bush bashing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/10/2006 9:30:49 PM     Post subject:  


But Bush is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Bush bashing


The only thing more fun than Bush Bashing is Blair Bashing ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Needs to get out more
Joined: 01 Feb 2004
Posts: 1139

Posted: 1/10/2006 9:58:37 PM     Post subject:  

Bush

EDIT: just checking the word filters! :lol:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:00:01 PM     Post subject:  

Mitch

EDIT: just checking the word filters! :lol:


*gasp*

Who would take a president called Mitch seriously XD

Now can we change 'fag' to 'cigarette'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:03:01 PM     Post subject:  

Mitch

EDIT: just checking the word filters! :lol:


I think it was better as 'Lowtax'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:30:42 PM     Post subject:  

Why did they change bush to mitch?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:32:00 PM     Post subject:  


But Mitch is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Mitch bashing


The only thing more fun than Mitch Bashing is Blair Bashing ;)


no seriously we'll take him.... that's a huge trade up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/10/2006 10:51:16 PM     Post subject:  


But Mitch is the most incompetent asshole in recent memory and I could never get enough Mitch bashing


The only thing more fun than Mitch Bashing is Blair Bashing ;)


no seriously we'll take him.... that's a huge trade up.


Urgh no, you can keep your ape, we'lll keep our lapdog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Cowgirl
Needs to get out more
Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts: 1151

Posted: 1/11/2006 1:58:55 AM     Post subject:  

Now can we change 'fag' to 'cigarette'?

No.
ALSO:
I must stop beating around the bush.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChildEatingMonster
Prattler
Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 107

Posted: 1/11/2006 2:36:26 AM     Post subject:  

so who the fuck do I talk to about the bitchpile thats sending me emails about how I need to make my dick bigger?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/11/2006 4:38:53 AM     Post subject:  

so who the fuck do I talk to about the bitchpile thats sending me emails about how I need to make my dick bigger?


A hooker who doesn't mind your small dick would be the person you need to get in touch with over that. :wink:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nopedestrian
Prattler
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 142

Posted: 1/11/2006 10:08:21 AM     Post subject:  

EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP I'M MEDITATING AND ASTRAL PROJECTING TO A COUNTRY AWAY FROM ALL OF YOU.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goofy
Vociferator
Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 316

Posted: 1/11/2006 2:33:51 PM     Post subject:  

you're all annoying!!! i'm reporting you all to teh INTORNAT POILICE!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stoneth
Needs to get out more
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 1267

Posted: 1/11/2006 3:37:09 PM     Post subject:  

you're all annoying!!! i'm reporting you all to teh INTORNAT POILICE!!!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LoKi
Venter
Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 287

Posted: 1/11/2006 7:16:38 PM     Post subject:  

Furries annoy me and are secrelty stalking me on the internet. Arrest all of those infidels!~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raygirl
Prattler
Joined: 03 Jan 2006
Posts: 198

Posted: 1/11/2006 7:42:31 PM     Post subject:  

You rats with wings you!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChildEatingMonster
Prattler
Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 107

Posted: 1/12/2006 6:07:46 AM     Post subject:  

A hooker who doesn't mind your small dick would be the person you need to get in touch with over that. :wink:


what? my dick isnt small, i swear to god stay out of my house, you. :x
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AngryPuritan
TOP POSTER!
Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Posts: 1437

Posted: 1/12/2006 9:26:22 AM     Post subject:  

Nothing to be ashamed of. It's not the size of the boat, it's the motion in the ocean...

At least that's what they always tell me. :cry:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octan
Coadjutor
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 95

Posted: 1/12/2006 5:27:48 PM     Post subject: Re: Hahahaha  

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.

Essentially, this is law is about stalking. If it wasn't stalking before, it isn't stalking now. But it wouldn't be the Internet if people didn't read headlines and detonate in an explosion of pure stupidity. Perhaps they need to stop taking the Internet so seriously.


Incidentally, for the link-impaired, the language in the law is as follows:
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, or indecent, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person;

So it has to be annoying and obscene. Oh wait, I guess this site still qualifies though. Crud.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoManVanGogh
Vociferator
Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 678

Posted: 1/12/2006 10:47:47 PM     Post subject:  

Now that I think about it, President Chimpy McFlightsuit would be the perfect candidate for a furry fan.

He can't differentiate between REALITY and his own delusional fantasies either!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peppersprayed
Vociferator
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 420

Posted: 1/12/2006 11:33:39 PM     Post subject:  

Now that I think about it, President Chimpy McFlightsuit would be the perfect candidate for a furry fan.

He can't differentiate between REALITY and his own delusional fantasies either!


It's exactly like furries

surrounded by people that always agree with you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wayd Wolf
Vociferator
Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 705

Posted: 1/13/2006 2:23:25 AM     Post subject: Re: Hahahaha  

I like how nobody, but nobody looked out the actual legislation. This law is not about "annoying people" - it's about repeated offenses which make the receiver honestly feel that they are in danger physically, or are being mentally tormented.


Actually that isn't it. The bill passed and signed into law modifies an existing law (existing since 1934) and changes it around a bit to basically include the Internet in it. You need to look at section 113 of the bill passed and then look at the 1934 law it refers to. Make the edits in a text editor for yourself and you see how the unconstitutional interpretational hilarity ensues.

The new law isn't creating a new law in section 113, it's editing an old one to serve a new purpose. Probably because it is easier to do that and look like you're "doing something" about cyberstalking as opposed to actually doing the intellectually hard work of figuring out a new law fitting the task which doesn't violate the constitution. As it is, much of VAWA is constitutionally malarkey to start with and is just getting worse.

GWB signed it for reasons other than this piddling yet signifigantly idiotic subsection. 113 was just one of those things going along for the ride like zebra mussels or kudzu. Might take a while for the stewards of the political environment, aka the Supreme Court) to get around to doing something about it similarly and be just as too late to avoid the senseless damage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message